Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs Framework Laptop 13 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

14 inches | January 2022

Speed 4

Size 8.5

Display 4.5

Gaming 2.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Framework Laptop 13

13.5 inches | May 2022

Speed 4

Size 9

Display 5

Gaming 2

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs Framework Laptop 13 Comparison Overview

Acer Swift X SFX14-5...

See at AMAZON

Framework Laptop 13

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift X SFX14-5...

See at AMAZON

Framework Laptop 13

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13, two laptops from Acer and Framework. Acer Swift X SFX14-51G was introduced to market in January 2022 and Framework Laptop 13 was launched in May 2022. There is only 4 months difference between Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and Framework Laptop 13 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G Key Specs

Launched in January 2022
14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU: GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB
8GB Ram
312.9 x 214 x 17.9 mm (12.32 x 8.43 x 0.7 inches)
Weight: 1.4 kg (3.09 lbs)

Framework Laptop 13 Key Specs

Launched in May 2022
13.5" IPS LCD, 3:2 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
8GB Ram
296 x 229 x 15.85 mm (11.65 x 9.02 x 0.62 inches)
Weight: 1.3 kg (2.87 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Swift X SFX14-51G over Framework Laptop 13

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~84.9% vs ~80.1%	Larger screen area ratio
Display Size	14 inches vs 13.5 inches	Larger Screen Estate
sRGB Color Space	99% vs 97.1%	Wider sRGB Color Space Coverage
DCI-P3 Color Gamut	70.2% vs 68.9%	Wider DCI-P3 Color Gamut
Adobe RGB Profile	72.5% vs 71.1%	Wider Adobe RGB Coverage
Response Time	35 ms vs 44 ms	Faster Response screen
GPU Fabrication Process	8 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	5.01 TFLOPS vs 1.41 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	Faster RAM Type
RAM Type	LPDDR5 vs DDR4	3D Surround Sound Support
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	Generates higher sound levels
Speaker Loudness	86 dB vs 77.5 dB	Better HDMI connectivity
HDMI Version	2.1 vs 2.0

Reasons to choose Framework Laptop 13 over Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Weight	1.30 kg vs 1.40 kg	0.1 kg lighter
Side Bezel Thickness	5.3 mm vs 5.7 mm	0.4 mm thinner bezels
Noise Level	49.2 dB vs 49.7 dB	Less fan noise
Screen PPI	201 ppi vs 189 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Opening Angle	180° vs 130°	More flexible screen
Screen Resolution	2256 x 1504 pixels vs 2240 x 1400 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Max Brightness	400 nits vs 330 nits	Brighter Screen
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	More RAM Options
Bluetooth	v5.3 vs v5.2	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Number of USB-C Ports	4x USB 4.0 vs 2x USB 4.0	Connect more device at the same time
Display Port	Yes vs No	Option to use Display port to connect to external monitors
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
Avg. MSRP Price	$800-1200 vs $1200-1600	Lower Price (*may change depending on config, seller, location, and time)

Common Strengths of Framework Laptop 13 and Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Launch Dates	January 2022 vs May 2022	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Coating	Matte vs Matte	Less reflections on the screen
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	LPDDR5 vs DDR4	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs Yes	Easy Login with Fingerprint Sensor
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Framework Laptop 13 and Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs Framework Laptop 13: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and the Framework Laptop 13.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.4 kg (3.09 lbs)	1.3 kg (2.87 lbs)
Surface Area	670 cm2 (103.9 inches2)	678 cm2 (105.1 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~84.9%	~80.1%
Side Bezel Thickness	~5.7 mm	~5.3 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.10 kg/inch	0.10 kg/inch
	0.22 lbs/inch	0.22 lbs/inch
Colors	Gray	Silver
Cover Opening Angle	130Â°	180Â°

Comparison of the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and the Framework Laptop 13 External Dimensions

Weight

Swift X SFX14-51G weighs 1.4 kg (3.09 lbs), whereas the Laptop 13 weighs 1.3 kg (2.87 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G is 0.10 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Framework Laptop 13 is 0.10 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)
Base Clock Frequency	938 MHz	300 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1223 MHz	1100 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	40 W	15 W
Nvidia Optimus	Yes
Type	Dedicated	Integrated
FLOPS	5.01 TFLOPS	1.41 TFLOPS
Memory Size	4 GB	System Shared
Memory Type	GDDR6	DDR4
Memory Bus	128 bit	System Shared
Memory Speed	12 Gbps	3.2 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2048	640
TMUs	64	40
ROPs	32	20

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Swift X SFX14-51G has a FLOPS value of 5.01 TFLOPS whereas the Framework Laptop 13 ' has a FLOPS value of 1.41 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB	8GB 16GB 32GB 64GB
Memory Bus	2x4 GB	1x8 GB
RAM Clock	4800 MHz	3200 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5	DDR4
Upgradable	No	Yes

Both laptops, the Swift X SFX14-51G and the Laptop 13, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Swift X (SFX14-51G)	Framework Laptop 13
CPU	Intel Core i5 1240P	Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU	GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)
Memory	8 GB ; 4 GB VRAM	8 GB
Available for LLM total	~8 GB (2.5 GB VRAM 5.5 GB RAM)	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 4 GB VRAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 3.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 4 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Swift X (SFX14-51G)|Framework Laptop 13

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	58.7 Wh	55 Wh 61 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	Yes
USB Power Delivery	Yes
Charging Port Position	Left	-
Charge Power	100 W	60 W

Moreover, the Swift X SFX14-51G boasts a larger battery capacity of 59 Wh, offering extended usage time compared to the Laptop 13's55 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

STORAGE
The Laptop 13 offers a larger max storage capacity of 4 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the Swift X SFX14-51G's storage capacity of 1 TB.

Storage Options	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs Framework Laptop 13: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and Framework Laptop 13 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Swift X SFX14-51G has a display size of 14.0".On the other hand, Laptop 13 has a smaller 13.5" display.The total usable screen area of the Swift X SFX14-51G is 568cm² / 88inch² whereas the Laptop 13's total usable screen area is 543cm² / 84inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Laptop 13 features a higher pixel density with 201 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Refresh Rate
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 offer the same refresh rate of 60 Hz.

Furthermore, the Swift X SFX14-51G boasts a faster response time of 35.0 ms, reducing motion blur for fast-paced content.

Brightness
The Laptop 13 offers a higher maximum brightness of 400 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs Framework Laptop 13 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both laptops offer the same Wi-Fi standard (v6E), ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Swift X SFX14-51G is equipped with 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. Laptop 13 does not have USB-A ports.
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 have USB Type-C ports. Swift X SFX14-51G has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Laptop 13 has 4x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 are equipped with Thunderbolt 4 ports.

HDMI
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 feature an HDMI port. Swift X SFX14-51G offers 1x HDMI 2.1, while Laptop 13 offers 1x HDMI 2.0.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Laptop 13 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. Swift X SFX14-51G does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and Laptop 13 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5.3
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	No
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	4x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.0
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	1x v1.4
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	Yes
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	Yes
SD CardReader	No	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No

Popular Comparisons of Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Here are the four most popular comparisons of the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G amongst Laptop Decision readers.

Lenovo Yoga Book 9i ..

Compare

Asus ROG Zephyrus G1..

Compare

Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7..

Compare

Acer Nitro V 16 ANV1..

Compare

Popular Comparisons of Framework Laptop 13

Also you will find below the four most popular comparisons of the Framework Laptop 13 amongst Laptop Decision readers.

Microsoft Surface La..

Compare

Dell XPS 17 9730 202..

Compare

Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7..

Compare

Dell G3 15 3500

Compare

Laptops by Brand

Acer Laptops

Apple Laptops

ASUS Laptops

Dell Laptops

Gigabyte Laptops

Honor Laptops

HP Laptops

Huawei Laptops

Lenovo Laptops

LG Laptops

Microsoft Laptops

MSI Laptops

Razer Laptops

Samsung Laptops

Latest Windows Laptops

Framework Laptop 13 Pro
April 2026 | 13.5 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 16
March 2026 | 16.0 inches

Dell Pro 14 Premium 2026
March 2026 | 14.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2i 16"
March 2026 | 16.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2a 16"
March 2026 | 16.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2i 14"
March 2026 | 14.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2a 14"
| inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14
March 2026 | 14.0 inches

Latest Apple Laptops

Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 2026
March 2026 | 13.6 inches

Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 2026
March 2026 | 15.3 inches

Apple MacBook Neo
March 2026 | 13.0 inches

Apple MacBook Pro 16 M5, 2026
March 2026 | 16.2 inches

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2026
March 2026 | 14.2 inches

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025
October 2025 | 14.2 inches

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 2025
March 2025 | 15.3 inches

Apple MacBook Air 13 M4 2025
March 2025 | 13.6 inches

Latest Gaming Laptops

Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 G635
January 2025 | 16.0 inches

Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 2025 G835
January 2025 | 18.0 inches

Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61
September 2024 | 14.5 inches

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
June 2024 | 16.0 inches

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401
June 2024 | 14.0 inches

Latest Convertible Laptops

Lenovo IdeaPad 5x 2-in-1 Gen 11 14 14Q8Y11
April 2026 | 14.0 inches

Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407
January 2026 | 14.0 inches

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 Aura Edition
January 2026 | 14.0 inches

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3M
January 2026 | 16.0 inches

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3M
January 2026 | 14.0 inches

Latest Workstation Laptops

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 15
January 2025 | 15.3 inches

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches

HP ZBook Ultra 14 G1a
January 2025 | 14.0 inches

Dell Pro 13
January 2025 | 13.3 inches

Dell Pro 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches

Latest Ultralight Laptops

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
1.21 kg (2.67 lbs) | 13.0 mm

Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
0.9 kg (1.98 lbs) | 15.9 mm

Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
1.23 kg (2.71 lbs) | 14.6 mm

Dell Pro 13
January 2025 | 13.3 inches
1.07 kg (2.36 lbs) | 18.0 mm

Dell Pro 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
1.14 kg (2.51 lbs) | 18.0 mm

Latest Thin&Light Laptops

Samsung Galaxy Book 5 Pro 16
February 2025 | 16.0 inches
1.56 kg (3.44 lbs) | 12.5 mm

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 15
January 2025 | 15.3 inches
1.4 kg (3.09 lbs) | 12.9 mm

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition 15 Intel
September 2024 | 15.3 inches
1.46 kg (3.22 lbs) | 15.2 mm

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 Gen 7 QOY Snapdragon
September 2024 | 16.0 inches
1.82 kg (4.01 lbs) | 16.7 mm

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14" AMD Gen 9
September 2024 | 14.5 inches
1.54 kg (3.4 lbs) | 16.6 mm

Latest ChromeOS Laptops

Acer Chromebook 516 GE
October 2022 | 16.0 inches

Acer Chromebook 512
January 2022 | 12.0 inches

Acer Chromebook 314
January 2022 | 14.0 inches

Acer Chromebook 311
January 2022 | 11.6 inches

CPU Model	Intel Core i5 1240P Intel Core i7 1260P	Intel Core i5 1240P Intel Core i7 1260P Intel Core i7 1280P Intel Core i5 1340P Intel Core i7 1360P Intel Core i7 1370P AMD Ryzen 5 7640U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Base Frequency	1.7 GHz	1.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Number of Cores	12	12
Number of Threads	16	16
L3 Cache	12 MB	12 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm	10 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single)	1593	1593
Geekbench 5 (Multi)	7956	7956
Cinebench 23 (Single)	1516	1516
Cinebench 23 (Multi)	9305	9305