Microsoft Surface Pro 12 vs Framework Laptop 13 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Microsoft Surface Pro 12

12 inches | May 2025

Speed 4

Size 8.5

Display 6

Gaming 2

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Framework Laptop 13

13.5 inches | May 2022

Speed 4

Size 9

Display 5

Gaming 2

CHECK AT AMAZON

Microsoft Surface Pro 12 vs Framework Laptop 13 Comparison Overview

Microsoft Surface Pr...

See at AMAZON

Framework Laptop 13

See at AMAZON

Microsoft Surface Pr...

See at AMAZON

Framework Laptop 13

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Surface Pro 12 and Laptop 13, two laptops from Microsoft and Framework. Microsoft Surface Pro 12 was introduced to market in May 2025 and Framework Laptop 13 was launched in May 2022. As you can see, Laptop 13 is 3 years older than Surface Pro 12. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Microsoft Surface Pro 12 and Framework Laptop 13 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Microsoft Surface Pro 12 Key Specs

Launched in May 2025
12.0" TouchScreen - IPS LCD, 3:2 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100)
GPU: Adreno X1-45
16GB Ram
274 x 190 x 7.8 mm (10.79 x 7.48 x 0.31 inches)
Weight: 0.68 kg (1.5 lbs)

Framework Laptop 13 Key Specs

Launched in May 2022
13.5" IPS LCD, 3:2 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
8GB Ram
296 x 229 x 15.85 mm (11.65 x 9.02 x 0.62 inches)
Weight: 1.3 kg (2.87 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Surface Pro 12 and Laptop 13 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Microsoft Surface Pro 12 over Framework Laptop 13

Weight	0.68 kg vs 1.30 kg	0.62 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~82.4% vs ~80.1%	Larger screen area ratio
Refresh Rate	90 Hz vs 60 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen PPI	220 ppi vs 201 ppi	More pixels per inch
2-in-1 Design	Yes vs No	Use like a tablet
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Interact with your fingers
CPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	2.3 TFLOPS vs 1.41 TFLOPS	Faster RAM Type
RAM Type	LPDDR5X vs DDR4	3D Surround Sound Support
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	More advanced Wi-fi connectivity
WiFi Standard	v7 vs v6E	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth	v5.4 vs v5.3

Reasons to choose Framework Laptop 13 over Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Side Bezel Thickness	5.3 mm vs 10.2 mm	4.9 mm thinner bezels
Display Size	13.5 inches vs 12 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Screen Resolution	2256 x 1504 pixels vs 2196 x 1464 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	More RAM Options
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs No	Easily increase the Storage when needed
NVMe Type SSD	Yes vs No	Faster data transfers
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs No	Easy login with fingerprint
Number of USB-C Ports	4x USB 4.0 vs 2x USB 4.0	Connect more device at the same time
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port
HDMI Port	1x HDMI 2.0 vs No	Connect to external monitors directly via HDMI cable
Display Port	Yes vs No	Option to use Display port to connect to external monitors
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs No	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Strengths of Framework Laptop 13 and Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Launch Dates	May 2025 vs May 2022	Both laptops are recent models
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable

Common Weaknesses of Framework Laptop 13 and Microsoft Surface Pro 12

HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support

Microsoft Surface Pro 12 vs Framework Laptop 13: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Microsoft Surface Pro 12 and the Framework Laptop 13.

Physical Specs
Weight	0.68 kg (1.5 lbs)	1.3 kg (2.87 lbs)
Surface Area	521 cm2 (80.7 inches2)	678 cm2 (105.1 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~82.4%	~80.1%
Side Bezel Thickness	~10.2 mm	~5.3 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.06 kg/inch	0.10 kg/inch
	0.132 lbs/inch	0.22 lbs/inch
Colors	Gray, Blue, Purple	Silver
Cover Opening Angle	360°	180Â°

Comparison of the Microsoft Surface Pro 12 and the Framework Laptop 13 External Dimensions

Weight

Surface Pro 12 weighs 0.68 kg (1.5 lbs), whereas the Laptop 13 weighs 1.3 kg (2.87 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Avg: 12.0-12.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Thickness Comparison

Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Avg: 12.0-12.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Microsoft Surface Pro 12 is 0.06 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Framework Laptop 13 is 0.10 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch
LG Gram 14 2022: 0.07 kg/inch

Microsoft Surface Pro 12 vs Framework Laptop 13: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100)	Intel Core i5 1240P Intel Core i7 1260P Intel Core i7 1280P Intel Core i5 1340P Intel Core i7 1360P Intel Core i7 1370P AMD Ryzen 5 7640U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Base Frequency	3.2 GHz	1.7 GHz
Turbo Frequency	3.4 GHz	4.4 GHz
Number of Cores	8	12
Number of Threads	8	16
Integrated GPU	Qualcomm Adreno X1-45	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)
CPU Fabrication Process	4 nm	10 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Microsoft Surface Pro 12 and Framework Laptop 13.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100)

Laptops with: Intel Core i5 1240P

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Qualcomm Adreno X1-45	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)
Base Clock Frequency	280 MHz	300 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1107 MHz	1100 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	30 W	15 W
Type	Integrated	Integrated
FLOPS	2.3 TFLOPS	1.41 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	DDR4
Memory Speed	8.45 Gbps	3.2 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	1024	640
TMUs	48	40
ROPs	24	20

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Microsoft Surface Pro 12 has a FLOPS value of 2.3 TFLOPS whereas the Framework Laptop 13 ' has a FLOPS value of 1.41 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Microsoft Surface Pro 12 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB	8GB 16GB 32GB 64GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB	1x8 GB
RAM Clock	8448 MHz	3200 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	DDR4
Upgradable	No	Yes

With a larger RAM capacity of 16 GB, the Surface Pro 12 offers an advantage for multitasking and resource-intensive applications compared to the Laptop 13's RAM capacity of 8 GB.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Microsoft Surface Pro 12	Framework Laptop 13
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100) (NPU - data limited)	Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU	Qualcomm Adreno X1-45	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)
Memory	16 GB	8 GB
Available for LLM total	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 3.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Microsoft Surface Pro 12|Framework Laptop 13

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	38 Wh	55 Wh 61 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	Yes
Charging Port Position	Right	-
Charge Power	45 W	60 W

On the other hand, the Laptop 13 features a higher battery capacity of 55 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the Surface Pro 12's 38 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Avg: 12.0-12.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

STORAGE
The Laptop 13 offers a larger max storage capacity of 4 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the Surface Pro 12's storage capacity of 512 GB.

Storage Options	256 GB, 512 GB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB
Upgradable	No	Yes
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	No	Yes
Memory Bus	Custom	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Microsoft Surface Pro 12 vs Framework Laptop 13: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Microsoft Surface Pro 12 and Framework Laptop 13 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Surface Pro 12 has a display size of 12.0".On the other hand, Laptop 13 has a larger13.5" display.The total usable screen area of the Surface Pro 12 is 429cm² / 66inch² whereas the Laptop 13's total usable screen area is 543cm² / 84inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Surface Pro 12 features a higher pixel density with 220 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Avg: 12.0-12.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Refresh Rate
The Surface Pro 12 offers a higher refresh rate of 90 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Brightness
Both Surface Pro 12 and Laptop 13 offer the same maximum brightness of 400 nits (cd/m²).

Brightness Comparison

Microsoft Surface Pro 12

Avg: 12.0-12.9"

Framework Laptop 13

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Microsoft Surface Pro 12 vs Framework Laptop 13 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Surface Pro 12 features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v7, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to Laptop 13 (v6E).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Neither Surface Pro 12 nor Laptop 13 has USB-A ports.
Both Surface Pro 12 and Laptop 13 have USB Type-C ports. Surface Pro 12 has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Laptop 13 has 4x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Laptop 13 is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. Surface Pro 12 does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Laptop 13 features an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.0) for connecting to external monitors. Surface Pro 12 does not have an HDMI port.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Laptop 13 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. Surface Pro 12 does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Laptop 13 is equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, allowing seamless connection to headphones and speakers. Surface Pro 12 does not have a 3.5mm Audio Jack.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v7	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.4	v5.3
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	No	No
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	4x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	No	1x HDMI 2.0
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	1x v1.4
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	Yes
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	No	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	Yes
SD CardReader	No	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No