Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs HP ENVY 17 2022 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

14 inches | January 2022

Speed 4

Size 8.5

Display 4.5

Gaming 2.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

HP ENVY 17 2022

17.3 inches | May 2022

Speed 4

Size 7

Display 3

Gaming 2

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs HP ENVY 17 2022 Comparison Overview

Acer Swift X SFX14-5...

See at AMAZON

HP ENVY 17 2022

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift X SFX14-5...

See at AMAZON

HP ENVY 17 2022

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022, two laptops from Acer and HP. Acer Swift X SFX14-51G was introduced to market in January 2022 and HP ENVY 17 2022 was launched in May 2022. There is only 4 months difference between Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and HP ENVY 17 2022 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G Key Specs

Launched in January 2022
14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU: GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB
8GB Ram
312.9 x 214 x 17.9 mm (12.32 x 8.43 x 0.7 inches)
Weight: 1.4 kg (3.09 lbs)

HP ENVY 17 2022 Key Specs

Launched in May 2022
17.3" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i7 1260P
GPU: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
8GB Ram
398.27 x 259.08 x 19.55 mm (15.68 x 10.2 x 0.77 inches)
Weight: 2.49 kg (5.49 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Swift X SFX14-51G over HP ENVY 17 2022

Weight	1.40 kg vs 2.49 kg	1.09 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~84.9% vs ~80%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	5.7 mm vs 7.6 mm	1.9 mm thinner bezels
Screen PPI	189 ppi vs 127 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	2240 x 1400 pixels vs 1920 x 1080 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Max Brightness	330 nits vs 300 nits	Brighter Screen
GPU Fabrication Process	8 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	5.01 TFLOPS vs 1.69 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	Faster RAM Type
RAM Type	LPDDR5 vs DDR4	3D Surround Sound Support
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	Easy login with fingerprint
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs No	Higher Resolution Camera
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720

Reasons to choose HP ENVY 17 2022 over Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Display Size	17.3 inches vs 14 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	More RAM Options
Number of USB-A Ports	3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No	Fast way to input numbers
Avg. MSRP Price	$0-400 vs $1200-1600	Lower Price (*may change depending on config, seller, location, and time)

Common Strengths of HP ENVY 17 2022 and Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Launch Dates	January 2022 vs May 2022	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Coating	Matte vs Matte	Less reflections on the screen
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
USB Power Delivery	Yes vs Yes	Charging via USB port gives flexibility
RAM Type	LPDDR5 vs DDR4	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
Bluetooth Standard	v5.2 vs v5.2	Fast and Reliable Bluetooth Connections
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of HP ENVY 17 2022 and Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs HP ENVY 17 2022: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and the HP ENVY 17 2022.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.4 kg (3.09 lbs)	2.49 kg (5.49 lbs)
Surface Area	670 cm2 (103.9 inches2)	1032 cm2 (159.9 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~84.9%	~80%
Side Bezel Thickness	~5.7 mm	~7.6 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.10 kg/inch	0.14 kg/inch
	0.22 lbs/inch	0.308 lbs/inch
Colors	Gray	Silver

Comparison of the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and the HP ENVY 17 2022 External Dimensions

Weight

Swift X SFX14-51G weighs 1.4 kg (3.09 lbs), whereas the ENVY 17 2022 weighs 2.49 kg (5.49 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

HP ENVY 17 2022

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

HP ENVY 17 2022

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G is 0.10 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the HP ENVY 17 2022 is 0.14 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs HP ENVY 17 2022: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core i5 1240P Intel Core i7 1260P	Intel Core i7 1260P
Base Frequency	1.7 GHz	2.1 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.4 GHz	4.7 GHz
Number of Cores	12	12
Number of Threads	16	16
L3 Cache	12 MB	18 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm	10 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single)	1593	1779
Geekbench 5 (Multi)	7956	9214
Cinebench 23 (Single)	1516	1745
Cinebench 23 (Multi)	9305	9746

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and HP ENVY 17 2022.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core i5 1240P

Laptops with: Intel Core i7 1260P

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Base Clock Frequency	938 MHz	300 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1223 MHz	1100 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	40 W	15 W
Nvidia Optimus	Yes
Type	Dedicated	Integrated
FLOPS	5.01 TFLOPS	1.69 TFLOPS
Memory Size	4 GB	System Shared
Memory Type	GDDR6	DDR4
Memory Bus	128 bit	System Shared
Memory Speed	12 Gbps	3.2 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2048	768
TMUs	64	48
ROPs	32	24

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Swift X SFX14-51G has a FLOPS value of 5.01 TFLOPS whereas the HP ENVY 17 2022 ' has a FLOPS value of 1.69 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB	8GB 16GB
Memory Bus	2x4 GB	2x4 GB
RAM Clock	4800 MHz	3200 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5	DDR4
Upgradable	No	Yes

Both laptops, the Swift X SFX14-51G and the ENVY 17 2022, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Swift X (SFX14-51G)	HP ENVY 17 (2022)
CPU	Intel Core i5 1240P	Intel Core i7 1260P
GPU	GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
Memory	8 GB ; 4 GB VRAM	8 GB
Available for LLM total	~8 GB (2.5 GB VRAM 5.5 GB RAM)	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 4 GB VRAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 3.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 4 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Swift X (SFX14-51G)|HP ENVY 17 (2022)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	58.7 Wh	55 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	Yes
USB Power Delivery	Yes	Yes
Charging Port Position	Left	Right
Charge Power	100 W	90 W

Moreover, the Swift X SFX14-51G boasts a larger battery capacity of 59 Wh, offering extended usage time compared to the ENVY 17 2022's55 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

HP ENVY 17 2022

Avg: larger than 17.0"

STORAGE
Both laptops, the Swift X SFX14-51G and the ENVY 17 2022 have similar max. storage capacities of 1 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs HP ENVY 17 2022: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Swift X SFX14-51G and HP ENVY 17 2022 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Swift X SFX14-51G has a display size of 14.0".On the other hand, ENVY 17 2022 has a larger17.3" display.The total usable screen area of the Swift X SFX14-51G is 568cm² / 88inch² whereas the ENVY 17 2022's total usable screen area is 825cm² / 128inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Swift X SFX14-51G features a higher pixel density with 189 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

HP ENVY 17 2022

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Refresh Rate
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 offer the same refresh rate of 60 Hz.

Brightness
The Swift X SFX14-51G offers a higher maximum brightness of 330 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

HP ENVY 17 2022

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Acer Swift X SFX14-51G vs HP ENVY 17 2022 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both laptops offer the same Wi-Fi standard (v6E), ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 have USB-A ports. Swift X SFX14-51G has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while ENVY 17 2022 has 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 feature 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 are equipped with Thunderbolt 4 ports.

HDMI
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
ENVY 17 2022 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. Swift X SFX14-51G does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Swift X SFX14-51G and ENVY 17 2022 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5.2
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	No	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No