Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

16 inches | September 2025

Speed 5

Size 4

Display 4.5

Gaming 3

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

14 inches | May 2025

Speed 5.5

Size 6.5

Display 8

Gaming 4

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Comparison Overview

Acer Nitro V 16 AI A...

See at AMAZON

Acer Predator Triton...

See at AMAZON

Acer Nitro V 16 AI A...

See at AMAZON

Acer Predator Triton...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52, two laptops by Acer. Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 was introduced to market in January and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 was launched in May 2025. As you can see, Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is 55 years older than Predator Triton 14 PT14-52. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 are members of Acer's series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

Acer Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T	January 2026	16.0"	355.25 x 245.4 x 14.85 mm	1.55 kg (3.42 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 16 AI SFE16-I51	January 2026	16.0"	357.15 x 244.64 x 14.6 mm	1.25 kg (2.76 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-I51	January 2026	14.0"	315 x 218.6 x 13.9 mm	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)
Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-71	August 2025	15.6"	362.9 x 237.5 x 19.9 mm	1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52	May 2025	14.0"	321.8 x 221 x 17.31 mm	1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71	May 2025	14.5"	323.9 x 254.7 x 20.8 mm	1.9 kg (4.19 lbs)
Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75	May 2025	14.0"	312.4 x 227.4 x 9.7 mm	1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)
Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G	May 2025	14.5"	322.4 x 227.4 x 9.76-17.96 mm	1.57 kg (3.46 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 Key Specs

Launched in January 1970
16.0" TN LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core 5 210H
GPU: GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB
8GB Ram
360 x 274.5 x 16.1-24.5 mm (14.17 x 10.81 x 0.63-0.96 inches)
Weight: 2.4 kg (5.29 lbs)

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Key Specs

Launched in May 2025
14.0" Touchscreen - OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
GPU: GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
16GB Ram
321.8 x 221 x 17.31 mm (12.67 x 8.7 x 0.68 inches)
Weight: 1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 over Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Side Bezel Thickness	7.7 mm vs 10.2 mm	2.5 mm thinner bezels
Display Size	16 inches vs 14 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Refresh Rate	180 Hz vs 120 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	More RAM Options
Number of Microphones	3 vs 2	Better Sound capture
Number of USB-A Ports	3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.2	Faster USB-C connection
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No	Fast way to input numbers

Reasons to choose Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 over Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Weight	1.60 kg vs 2.40 kg	0.8 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~79.9% vs ~75.1%	Larger screen area ratio
Screen PPI	243 ppi vs 138 ppi	More pixels per inch
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Interact with your fingers
Screen Resolution	2880 x 1800 pixels vs 1920 x 1080 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
sRGB Color Space	100% vs 62%	Wider sRGB Color Space Coverage
Max Brightness	400 nits vs 300 nits	Brighter Screen
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 5 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	15.3 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS	Flexible cable positions
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Bottom	More advanced Wi-fi connectivity
WiFi Standard	v7 vs v6	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth	v5.4 vs v5.2	Easy login with fingerprint
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs No	Higher Resolution Camera
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Connect more device at the same time
Number of USB-C Ports	2x USB 3.2 vs 1x USB 4.0

Common Strengths of Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 and Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	DDR5 vs LPDDR5X	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 and Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52.

Physical Specs
Weight	2.4 kg (5.29 lbs)	1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)
Surface Area	988 cm2 (153.2 inches2)	711 cm2 (110.2 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~75.1%	~79.9%
Side Bezel Thickness	~7.7 mm	~10.2 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.15 kg/inch	0.11 kg/inch
	0.33 lbs/inch	0.242 lbs/inch
Colors	Black	Black
Cover Opening Angle	140°	140°

Comparison of the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 External Dimensions

Weight

Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 weighs 2.4 kg (5.29 lbs), whereas the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 weighs 1.6 kg (3.53 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is 0.15 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 is 0.11 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core 5 210H Intel Core 7 240H Intel Core 9 270H	Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Base Frequency	2.2 GHz	3.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.8 GHz	5.1 GHz
Number of Cores	8 (4P + 4E)	8 (4P + 4E)
Number of Threads	12	8
L3 Cache	12 MB	12 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU)	Intel Arc Graphics 140V
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm	3 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core 5 210H

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 8GB	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 8GB
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	0 W	90 W
Nvidia Optimus	MUX	Yes, Advanced Optimus
Type	Dedicated	Dedicated
FLOPS	4.5 TFLOPS	15.3 TFLOPS
Memory Size	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR7
Memory Bus	128 bit	128 bit
Memory Speed	~24 Gbps	~24 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2560	3328
TMUs	80	104
ROPs	32	48

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has a FLOPS value of 4.5 TFLOPS whereas the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 ' has a FLOPS value of 15.3 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB 32GB	16GB 32GB
Memory Bus	1x8 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	5600 MHz	8533 MHz
RAM Type	DDR5	LPDDR5X
Upgradable	Yes	No
Max RAM Size	32 GB
Total Slots	2

The Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 provides a larger RAM capacity of 16 GB, which allows for smoother multitasking and improved performance in memory-demanding tasks compared to the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72's RAM capacity of 8 GB.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-72)	Acer Predator Triton 14 (PT14-52)
CPU	Intel Core 5 210H	Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
GPU	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
Memory	8 GB ; 8 GB VRAM	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~12 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 5.5 GB RAM)	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-72)|Acer Predator Triton 14 (PT14-52)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	76 Wh	76 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	Yes	No
Charging Port Position	Bottom	Left, Right
Charge Power	135 W	140 W

Furthermore, both laptops have the same battery capacity of 76 Wh, ensuring comparable battery performance.

Battery Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

STORAGE
With a larger storage capacity up to 2 TB, the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 provides more space for storing files and applications compared to the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52's max. storage capacity of 1 TB.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB	512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	2	1
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has a display size of 16.0".On the other hand, Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 has a smaller 14.0" display.The total usable screen area of the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is 742cm² / 115inch² whereas the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52's total usable screen area is 568cm² / 88inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 features a higher pixel density with 243 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Refresh Rate
The Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 offers a higher refresh rate of 180 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Brightness
The Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 offers a higher maximum brightness of 400 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v7, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 (v6).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 have USB-A ports. Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 have USB Type-C ports. Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has 1x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 has 2x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 are equipped with Thunderbolt 4 ports.

HDMI
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6	v7
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5.4
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	3x USB 3.2	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	1x USB 4.0	2x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	Yes
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	Yes	No
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	No