Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

16 inches | September 2025

Speed 5

Size 4

Display 4.5

Gaming 3

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

15.6 inches | January 2023

Speed 5

Size 9.5

Display 4.5

Gaming 2.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 Comparison Overview

Acer Nitro V 16 AI A...

See at AMAZON

LG Gram SuperSlim 15...

See at AMAZON

Acer Nitro V 16 AI A...

See at AMAZON

LG Gram SuperSlim 15...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023, two laptops from Acer and LG. Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 was introduced to market in January and LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 was launched in January 2023. As you can see, Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is 53 years older than Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 Key Specs

Launched in January 1970
16.0" TN LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core 5 210H
GPU: GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB
8GB Ram
360 x 274.5 x 16.1-24.5 mm (14.17 x 10.81 x 0.63-0.96 inches)
Weight: 2.4 kg (5.29 lbs)

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 Key Specs

Launched in January 2023
15.6" OLED, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i7 1360P
GPU: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
8GB Ram
356 x 227.45 x 10.99-12.55 mm (14.02 x 8.95 x 0.43-0.49 inches)
Weight: 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 over LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

Display Size	16 inches vs 15.6 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Refresh Rate	180 Hz vs 60 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
GPU Fabrication Process	5 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	4.5 TFLOPS vs 1.69 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	More RAM Options
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	Better Sound capture
Number of Microphones	3 vs 2	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth	v5.2 vs v5.1	Connect to external monitors directly via HDMI cable
HDMI Port	1x HDMI 2.1 vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No

Reasons to choose LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 over Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Weight	0.99 kg vs 2.40 kg	1.41 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~82.9% vs ~75.1%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	5.3 mm vs 7.7 mm	2.4 mm thinner bezels
Screen PPI	141 ppi vs 138 ppi	More pixels per inch
sRGB Color Space	100% vs 62%	Wider sRGB Color Space Coverage
Max Brightness	400 nits vs 300 nits	Brighter Screen
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	3D Surround Sound Support
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Camera
Number of USB-C Ports	3x USB 4.0 vs 1x USB 4.0	Connect more device at the same time

Common Strengths of LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 and Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	DDR5 vs LPDDR5	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6 vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
Bluetooth Standard	v5.2 vs v5.1	Fast and Reliable Bluetooth Connections
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Numeric Pad	Yes vs Yes	Fast way to input numbers
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 and Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
Fingerprint Sensor	No vs No	No fingerprint login feature

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and the LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023.

Physical Specs
Weight	2.4 kg (5.29 lbs)	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)
Surface Area	988 cm2 (153.2 inches2)	810 cm2 (125.5 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~75.1%	~82.9%
Side Bezel Thickness	~7.7 mm	~5.3 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.15 kg/inch	0.06 kg/inch
	0.33 lbs/inch	0.132 lbs/inch
Colors	Black	Black

Comparison of the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and the LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 External Dimensions

Weight

Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 weighs 2.4 kg (5.29 lbs), whereas the Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 weighs 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is 0.15 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 is 0.06 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch
LG Gram 14 2022: 0.07 kg/inch

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core 5 210H Intel Core 7 240H Intel Core 9 270H	Intel Core i7 1360P
Base Frequency	2.2 GHz	2.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.8 GHz	5 GHz
Number of Cores	8 (4P + 4E)	12
Number of Threads	12	16
L3 Cache	12 MB	18 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 (48EU)	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm	10 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core 5 210H

Laptops with: Intel Core i7 1360P

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 8GB	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	0 W	15 W
Nvidia Optimus	MUX
Type	Dedicated	Integrated
FLOPS	4.5 TFLOPS	1.69 TFLOPS
Memory Size	8 GB	System Shared
Memory Type	GDDR7	LPDDR5
Memory Bus	128 bit	System Shared
Memory Speed	~24 Gbps	6 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2560	768
TMUs	80	48
ROPs	32	24

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has a FLOPS value of 4.5 TFLOPS whereas the LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 ' has a FLOPS value of 1.69 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB 32GB	8GB 16GB 32GB
Memory Bus	1x8 GB	2x4 GB
RAM Clock	5600 MHz	6000 MHz
RAM Type	DDR5	LPDDR5
Upgradable	Yes	No
Max RAM Size	32 GB
Total Slots	2

Both laptops, the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and the Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-72)	LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023)
CPU	Intel Core 5 210H	Intel Core i7 1360P
GPU	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
Memory	8 GB ; 8 GB VRAM	8 GB
Available for LLM total	~12 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 5.5 GB RAM)	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 3.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Nitro V 16 AI (ANV16-72)|LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	76 Wh	60 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	Yes	No
Charging Port Position	Bottom	Left
Charge Power	135 W	65 W

Moreover, the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 boasts a larger battery capacity of 76 Wh, offering extended usage time compared to the Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023's60 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

STORAGE
Both laptops, the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and the Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 have similar max. storage capacities of 2 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	2	2
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has a display size of 16.0".On the other hand, Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 has a smaller 15.6" display.The total usable screen area of the Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is 742cm² / 115inch² whereas the Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023's total usable screen area is 670cm² / 104inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 features a higher pixel density with 141 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Refresh Rate
The Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 offers a higher refresh rate of 180 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Brightness
The Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 offers a higher maximum brightness of 400 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v6E, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 (v6).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is equipped with 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 does not have USB-A ports.
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 have USB Type-C ports. Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 has 1x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 has 3x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 are equipped with Thunderbolt 4 ports.

HDMI
Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 features an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors. Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 does not have an HDMI port.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-72 and Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5.1
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	3x USB 3.2	No
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	1x USB 4.0	3x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	No
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	Yes	No
SD CardReader	Yes	No
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	No