Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

16 inches | January 2026

Speed 6

Size 8

Display 7

Gaming 4

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

16 inches | January 2026

Speed 6.5

Size 4

Display 7

Gaming 5

CHECK AT AMAZON

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 Comparison Overview

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura E...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Zephyrus Du...

See at AMAZON

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura E...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Zephyrus Du...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651, two laptops from Lenovo and Asus. Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 was introduced to market in January 2026 and Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 was launched in January 2026. Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 are members of Asus's series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

Lenovo Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Lenovo IdeaPad 5x 2-in-1 Gen 11 14 14Q8Y11	April 2026	14.0"	311.6 x 224.9 x 17.4 mm	1.4 kg (3.09 lbs)
Lenovo Legion 7a Gen 11 16AGP11, 2026	March 2026	16.0"	344 x 244.5 x 18.95-19.95 mm	1.87 kg (4.12 lbs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 7	March 2026	14.5"	325.2 x 226.3 x 16.22-22.2 mm	1.63 kg (3.59 lbs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P16s Gen 5	March 2026	16.0"	357.9 x 247.9 x 18.15 mm	1.79 kg (3.95 lbs)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 Gen 5	March 2026	16.0"	357.9 x 247.9 x 18.2-23.8 mm	1.63 kg (3.59 lbs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 8	February 2026	14.0"	313 x 220.3 x 19.7 mm	1.34 kg (2.95 lbs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E16 Gen 4	February 2026	16.0"	356 x 249 x 21.15 mm	1.63 kg (3.59 lbs)
Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 11 2026	January 2026	15.3"	344 x 245.5 x 18.95-19.95 mm	1.87 kg (4.12 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 Key Specs

Launched in January 2026
16.0" TouchScreen - OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
GPU: GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB
32GB Ram
360.6 x 247.9 x 17.2 mm (14.2 x 9.76 x 0.68 inches)
Weight: 1.9 kg (4.19 lbs)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 Key Specs

Launched in January 2026
16.0" Touchscreen - OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
GPU: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB
16GB Ram
355 x 246 x 19.9-24.9 mm (13.98 x 9.69 x 0.78-0.98 inches)
Weight: 2.82 kg (6.22 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 over Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Weight	1.90 kg vs 2.82 kg	0.92 kg lighter
RAM BUS	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) vs PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x)	Faster RAM

Reasons to choose Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 over Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~85% vs ~83%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	5.2 mm vs 8 mm	2.8 mm thinner bezels
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 5 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	17-26.8 TFLOPS vs 13.6 TFLOPS	Flexible cable positions
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Left	Faster USB-C connection
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.2	Better typing feel
Key Travel	1.7 mm vs 1.5 mm

Common Strengths of Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 and Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Launch Dates	January 2026 vs January 2026	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Type	Touch Screen vs Touch Screen	Interact with your fingers
Screen Technology	OLED vs OLED	High Screen Quality
HDR Support	Yes, Dolby Vision vs Yes, HDR10	Watch HDR Clips
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5X	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Dolby Atmos Support	Yes vs Yes	3D Surround Sound Support
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 and Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Upgradable RAM	No vs No	No Option to increase the RAM size
Fingerprint Sensor	No vs No	No fingerprint login feature

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.9 kg (4.19 lbs)	2.82 kg (6.22 lbs)
Surface Area	894 cm2 (138.6 inches2)	873 cm² (135.5 inches²)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~83%	~85%
Side Bezel Thickness	~8 mm	~5.2 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.12 kg/inch	0.18 kg/inch
	0.264 lbs/inch	0.396 lbs/inch
Colors	Gray	Gray

Comparison of the Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 External Dimensions

Weight

Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 weighs 1.9 kg (4.19 lbs), whereas the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 weighs 2.82 kg (6.22 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. The weight difference between the two laptops is not significant.

Weight Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Min

Average

Max

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 is 0.12 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 is 0.18 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core Ultra 7 356H Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
Base Frequency	1.9 GHz	2.1 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.7 GHz	4.9 GHz
Number of Cores	16 (4P + 12E)	16 (4P + 12E)
Number of Threads	16	16
L3 Cache	18 MB	18 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Xe3 Graphics	Intel Xe3 Graphics
CPU Fabrication Process	2 nm	2 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 9 386H

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB	GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 16GB GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	100 W
Nvidia Optimus	Yes, Advanced Optimus	MUX
Type	Dedicated	Dedicated
FLOPS	13.6 TFLOPS	17-26.8 TFLOPS
Memory Size	8 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR7
Memory Bus	128 bit	192 bit
Memory Speed	~24 Gbps	~28 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2560	5888
TMUs	80	184
ROPs	32	64

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 has a FLOPS value of 13.6 TFLOPS whereas the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 ' has a FLOPS value of 17-26.8 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	32GB 64GB	16GB 32GB 64GB
Memory Bus	2x16 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	7467 MHz	8533 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Upgradable	No	No

With a larger RAM capacity of 32 GB, the Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 offers an advantage for multitasking and resource-intensive applications compared to the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651's RAM capacity of 16 GB.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition (16")	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651
CPU	Intel Core Ultra 7 356H	Intel Core Ultra 9 386H
GPU	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB	GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB
Memory	32 GB ; 8 GB VRAM	16 GB ; 12 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~33.7 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 27.2 GB RAM)	~23.3 GB (10.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 12 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 12 GB VRAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✔ Runs Well fits in your 12 GB VRAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 12 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 12 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition (16")|Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	92.2 Wh	90 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	No
Charging Port Position	Left	Left, Right
Charge Power	170 / 245 W	250 W

Moreover, the Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 boasts a larger battery capacity of 92 Wh, offering extended usage time compared to the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651's90 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Min

Average

Max

STORAGE
Both laptops, the Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 have similar max. storage capacities of 4 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB	1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	2	2
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 5.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 screens have the same size of 16.0".The total usable screen area of the Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 is 742cm² / 115inch² whereas the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651's total usable screen area is 742cm² / 115inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 feature the same pixel density with 212 pixels per inch (PPI).

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Min

Average

Max

Refresh Rate
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 offer the same refresh rate of 120 Hz.

Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 boast the same response time of 1.0 ms.

Brightness
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 offer the same maximum brightness of 500 nits (cd/m²).

Brightness Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651

Min

Average

Max

Lenovo Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 support the latest Wi-Fi standard v7.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 feature 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 have USB Type-C ports. Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 has 2x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports, while ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 are equipped with Thunderbolt 4 ports.

HDMI
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 and ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX651 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v7	v7
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v6.0	v6.0
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 3.2	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	Yes