HP Omen 16 2022 AMD vs Dell Precision 7770 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

16.1 inches | July 2022

Speed 5

Size 7.5

Display 5

Gaming 3.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Dell Precision 7770

17.3 inches | April 2022

Speed 5

Size 6.5

Display 3.5

Gaming 4

CHECK AT AMAZON

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD vs Dell Precision 7770 Comparison Overview

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

See at AMAZON

Dell Precision 7770

See at AMAZON

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

See at AMAZON

Dell Precision 7770

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770, two laptops from HP and Dell. HP Omen 16 2022 AMD was introduced to market in July 2022 and Dell Precision 7770 was launched in April 2022. There is only 3 months difference between Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of HP Omen 16 2022 AMD and Dell Precision 7770 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD Key Specs

Launched in July 2022
16.1" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
GPU: GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB
16GB Ram
369 x 248 x 23 mm (14.53 x 9.76 x 0.91 inches)
Weight: 2.41 kg (5.31 lbs)

Dell Precision 7770 Key Specs

Launched in April 2022
17.3" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 12600HX
GPU: GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 16GB
16GB Ram
398 x 265.02 x 25.9-26.7 mm (15.67 x 10.43 x 1.02-1.05 inches)
Weight: 3.02 kg (6.66 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose HP Omen 16 2022 AMD over Dell Precision 7770

Weight	2.41 kg vs 3.02 kg	0.61 kg lighter
Side Bezel Thickness	6.3 mm vs 7.5 mm	1.2 mm thinner bezels
Refresh Rate	144 Hz vs 60 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen PPI	137 ppi vs 127 ppi	More pixels per inch
Response Time	14 ms vs 35 ms	Faster Response screen
CPU Fabrication Process	6 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation CPU
Max Total RAM	32 GB vs 2 GB	Higher RAM potential
Number of USB-A Ports	3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
Touchpad Size	13.0 x 8.6 cm vs 11.5 x 8.0 cm	Larger Touchpad Area
Avg. MSRP Price	$1200-1600 vs $3200-3600	Lower Price (*may change depending on config, seller, location, and time)

Reasons to choose Dell Precision 7770 over HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~78.2% vs ~78.1%	Larger screen area ratio
Display Size	17.3 inches vs 16.1 inches	Larger Screen Estate
sRGB Color Space	100% vs 99.2%	Wider sRGB Color Space Coverage
DCI-P3 Color Gamut	99% vs 74.4%	Wider DCI-P3 Color Gamut
Max Brightness	500 nits vs 300 nits	Brighter Screen
GPU FLOPS	16.8-24.6 TFLOPS vs 7.46 TFLOPS	Higher Resolution Camera
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Connect more device at the same time
Number of USB-C Ports	3x USB 4.0 vs 2x USB 4.0	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Fast way to input numbers
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No

Common Strengths of Dell Precision 7770 and HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Launch Dates	July 2022 vs April 2022	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Coating	Matte vs Matte	Less reflections on the screen
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
USB Power Delivery	Yes vs Yes	Charging via USB port gives flexibility
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the RAM size
RAM Type	DDR5 vs DDR5	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
Bluetooth Standard	v5.2 vs v5.2	Fast and Reliable Bluetooth Connections
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs Yes	Fast connection to Network via ethernet cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Dell Precision 7770 and HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD vs Dell Precision 7770: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the HP Omen 16 2022 AMD and the Dell Precision 7770.

Physical Specs
Weight	2.41 kg (5.31 lbs)	3.02 kg (6.66 lbs)
Surface Area	915 cm2 (141.8 inches2)	1055 cm2 (163.4 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~78.1%	~78.2%
Side Bezel Thickness	~6.3 mm	~7.5 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.15 kg/inch	0.17 kg/inch
	0.33 lbs/inch	0.374 lbs/inch
Colors	Silver	Black

Comparison of the HP Omen 16 2022 AMD and the Dell Precision 7770 External Dimensions

Weight

Omen 16 2022 AMD weighs 2.41 kg (5.31 lbs), whereas the Precision 7770 weighs 3.02 kg (6.66 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Dell Precision 7770

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Thickness Comparison

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Dell Precision 7770

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the HP Omen 16 2022 AMD is 0.15 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Dell Precision 7770 is 0.17 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD vs Dell Precision 7770: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	AMD Ryzen 7 6800H AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	Intel Core i5 12600HX Intel Core i7 12800HX Intel Core i7 12850HX Intel Core i9 12900HX
Base Frequency	3.2 GHz	2.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.7 GHz	4.6 GHz
Number of Cores	8	12
Number of Threads	16	16
L3 Cache	16 MB	18 MB
Integrated GPU	AMD Radeon 680M	Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)
CPU Fabrication Process	6 nm	10 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single)	1625	1634
Geekbench 5 (Multi)	10049	8862

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the HP Omen 16 2022 AMD and Dell Precision 7770.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

Laptops with: Intel Core i5 12600HX

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6GB GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile 8GB	GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 16GB
Base Clock Frequency	735 MHz	810 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1035 MHz	1260 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	75 W	115 W
Nvidia Optimus	Yes
Type	Dedicated	Dedicated
FLOPS	7.46 TFLOPS	16.8-24.6 TFLOPS
Memory Size	4 GB	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bus	128 bit	256 bit
Memory Speed	~12 Gbps	~16 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2560	7424
TMUs	80	232
ROPs	32	96

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. HP Omen 16 2022 AMD has a FLOPS value of 7.46 TFLOPS whereas the Dell Precision 7770 ' has a FLOPS value of 16.8-24.6 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the HP Omen 16 2022 AMD may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 32GB	16GB 32GB 64GB 128GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB	1x16 GB
RAM Clock	4800 MHz	4800 MHz
RAM Type	DDR5	DDR5
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Max RAM Size	32 GB	2 GB
Total Slots	2	2

Both laptops, the Omen 16 2022 AMD and the Precision 7770, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	HP Omen 16 2022 (AMD)	Dell Precision 7770
CPU	AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	Intel Core i5 12600HX
GPU	GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 4GB	GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 16GB
Memory	16 GB ; 4 GB VRAM	16 GB ; 16 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~15.3 GB (2.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)	~27.3 GB (14.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 4 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 16 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 4 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 16 GB VRAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 4 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✔ Runs Well fits in your 16 GB VRAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 4 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 16 GB VRAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 16 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 16 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

HP Omen 16 2022 (AMD)|Dell Precision 7770

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	83 Wh	83 Wh 93 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No
Fast Charging	Yes	Yes
USB Power Delivery	Yes	Yes
Charging Port Position	Bottom	Left
Charge Power	200 / 280 W	180 / 240 W
Full Charging Time	2:20 hr
AC Adapter Weight	922 grams

Furthermore, both laptops have the same battery capacity of 83 Wh, ensuring comparable battery performance.

Battery Comparison

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Dell Precision 7770

Avg: larger than 17.0"

STORAGE
The Precision 7770 offers a larger max storage capacity of 8 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the Omen 16 2022 AMD's storage capacity of 1 TB.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB, 8 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD vs Dell Precision 7770: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the HP Omen 16 2022 AMD and Dell Precision 7770 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Omen 16 2022 AMD has a display size of 16.1".On the other hand, Precision 7770 has a larger17.3" display.The total usable screen area of the Omen 16 2022 AMD is 714cm² / 111inch² whereas the Precision 7770's total usable screen area is 825cm² / 128inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Omen 16 2022 AMD features a higher pixel density with 137 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Dell Precision 7770

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Refresh Rate
The Omen 16 2022 AMD offers a higher refresh rate of 144 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Furthermore, the Omen 16 2022 AMD boasts a faster response time of 14.0 ms, reducing motion blur for fast-paced content.

Brightness
The Precision 7770 offers a higher maximum brightness of 500 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Dell Precision 7770

Avg: larger than 17.0"

HP Omen 16 2022 AMD vs Dell Precision 7770 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both laptops offer the same Wi-Fi standard (v6E), ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 have USB-A ports. Omen 16 2022 AMD has 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while Precision 7770 has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 have USB Type-C ports. Omen 16 2022 AMD has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Precision 7770 has 3x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Precision 7770 is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. Omen 16 2022 AMD does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both Omen 16 2022 AMD and Precision 7770 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5.2
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	3x USB 3.2	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	3x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	Optional
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	Yes	Yes
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	Yes