Dell Pro Precision 7 14 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Dell Pro Precision 7 14

14 inches | March 2026

Speed 5.5

Size 6.5

Display 4

Gaming 3.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

14 inches | May 2025

Speed 5.5

Size 6.5

Display 8

Gaming 4

CHECK AT AMAZON

Dell Pro Precision 7 14 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Comparison Overview

Dell Pro Precision 7...

See at AMAZON

Acer Predator Triton...

See at AMAZON

Dell Pro Precision 7...

See at AMAZON

Acer Predator Triton...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52, two laptops from Dell and Acer. Dell Pro Precision 7 14 was introduced to market in March 2026 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 was launched in May 2025. There is only 10 months difference between Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 are members of Acer's series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

Dell Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Dell Pro Precision 7 14	March 2026	14.0"	310.6 x 212.45 x 18.91-19.72 mm	1.59 kg (3.51 lbs)
Dell Pro 14 Premium 2026	March 2026	14.0"	311.2 x 216.7 x 16.78-19.85 mm	1.15 kg (2.54 lbs)
Dell Pro Precision 7 16	March 2026	16.0"	353.8 x 240.28 x 20.24-20.85 mm	2.17 kg (4.78 lbs)
Dell XPS 14 2026	January 2026	14.0"	309.52 x 209.71 x 14.62 mm	1.36 kg (3 lbs)
Dell XPS 16 2026	January 2026	16.0"	352.58 x 237.47 x 14.62 mm	1.65 kg (3.64 lbs)
Dell 16 Premium	June 2025	16.3"	358.18 x 240.05 x 18.7 mm	2.07 kg (4.56 lbs)
Dell Pro 14 Plus 2-in-1	June 2025	14.0"	313.5 x 224 x 19.92-20.25 mm	1.59 kg (3.51 lbs)
Dell 16	June 2025	16.0"	356.78 x 249.52 x 16.18-19.05 mm	1.98 kg (4.37 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of Dell Pro Precision 7 14 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Dell Pro Precision 7 14 Key Specs

Launched in March 2026
14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
GPU: RTX Pro 1000 Laptop (Blackwell) 8GB
16GB Ram
310.6 x 212.45 x 18.91-19.72 mm (12.23 x 8.36 x 0.74-0.78 inches)
Weight: 1.59 kg (3.51 lbs)

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Key Specs

Launched in May 2025
14.0" Touchscreen - OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
GPU: GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
16GB Ram
321.8 x 221 x 17.31 mm (12.67 x 8.7 x 0.68 inches)
Weight: 1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Dell Pro Precision 7 14 over Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Weight	1.59 kg vs 1.60 kg	0.01 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~86.1% vs ~79.9%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	4.6 mm vs 10.2 mm	5.6 mm thinner bezels
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
CPU Fabrication Process	2 nm vs 3 nm	Newer Generation CPU
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	3D Surround Sound Support
Bluetooth	v6.0 vs v5.4	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Webcam Resolution	2560 x 1440 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Camera
Number of USB-C Ports	4x USB 4.0 vs 2x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.2	Faster USB-C connection

Reasons to choose Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 over Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Refresh Rate	120 Hz vs 60 Hz	Smoother media experience
Contrast Rate	1000000:1 vs 1500:1	more pleasing colors
Screen PPI	243 ppi vs 162 ppi	More pixels per inch
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Interact with your fingers
Screen Resolution	2880 x 1800 pixels vs 1920 x 1200 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Response Time	1 ms vs 35 ms	Faster Response screen
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 5 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	15.3 TFLOPS vs 8.3-12.3 TFLOPS	Connect to external monitors directly via HDMI cable
HDMI Port	1x HDMI 2.1 vs No

Common Strengths of Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 and Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Launch Dates	March 2026 vs May 2025	Both laptops are recent models
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Left, Right	Flexible charging positions
RAM Type	LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5X	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Thunderbolt Port	v5 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 and Dell Pro Precision 7 14

HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support
Upgradable RAM	No vs No	No Option to increase the RAM size

Dell Pro Precision 7 14 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Dell Pro Precision 7 14 and the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.59 kg (3.51 lbs)	1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)
Surface Area	660 cm2 (102.2 inches2)	711 cm2 (110.2 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~86.1%	~79.9%
Side Bezel Thickness	~4.6 mm	~10.2 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.11 kg/inch	0.11 kg/inch
	0.242 lbs/inch	0.242 lbs/inch
Colors	Black	Black

Comparison of the Dell Pro Precision 7 14 and the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 External Dimensions

Weight

Pro Precision 7 14 weighs 1.59 kg (3.51 lbs), whereas the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 weighs 1.6 kg (3.53 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. The weight difference between the two laptops is not significant.

Weight Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Min

Average

Max

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Dell Pro Precision 7 14 is 0.11 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 is 0.11 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Dell Pro Precision 7 14 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core Ultra 7 356H Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Intel Core Ultra X7 368H Intel Core Ultra 9 386H	Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Base Frequency	1.9 GHz	3.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.7 GHz	5.1 GHz
Number of Cores	16 (4P + 12E)	8 (4P + 4E)
Number of Threads	16	8
L3 Cache	18 MB	12 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Xe3 Graphics	Intel Arc Graphics 140V
CPU Fabrication Process	2 nm	3 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Dell Pro Precision 7 14 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 9 288V

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	RTX Pro 1000 Laptop (Blackwell) 8GB RTX Pro 2000 Laptop (Blackwell) 8GB	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 8GB
TGP (Total Graphics Power)		90 W
Nvidia Optimus	Yes	Yes, Advanced Optimus
Type	Dedicated	Dedicated
FLOPS	8.3-12.3 TFLOPS	15.3 TFLOPS
Memory Size	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR7
Memory Bus	128 bit	128 bit
Memory Speed	~24 Gbps	~24 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2560	3328
TMUs	80	104
ROPs	32	48

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Dell Pro Precision 7 14 has a FLOPS value of 8.3-12.3 TFLOPS whereas the Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 ' has a FLOPS value of 15.3 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Dell Pro Precision 7 14 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 32GB 64GB	16GB 32GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	8533 MHz	8533 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Upgradable	No	No

Both laptops, the Pro Precision 7 14 and the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Dell Pro Precision 7 14	Acer Predator Triton 14 (PT14-52)
CPU	Intel Core Ultra 7 356H	Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
GPU	RTX Pro 1000 Laptop (Blackwell) 8GB	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
Memory	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Dell Pro Precision 7 14|Acer Predator Triton 14 (PT14-52)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	72 Wh	76 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	No
Charging Port Position	Left, Right	Left, Right
Charge Power	100 / 130 W	140 W
Voltage	15.6 V

On the other hand, the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 features a higher battery capacity of 76 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the Pro Precision 7 14's 72 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Min

Average

Max

STORAGE
With a larger storage capacity up to 4 TB, the Pro Precision 7 14 provides more space for storing files and applications compared to the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52's max. storage capacity of 1 TB.

Storage Options	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB	512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	1	1
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Dell Pro Precision 7 14 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Dell Pro Precision 7 14 and Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 screens have the same size of 14.0".The total usable screen area of the Pro Precision 7 14 is 568cm² / 88inch² whereas the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52's total usable screen area is 568cm² / 88inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 features a higher pixel density with 243 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Min

Average

Max

Refresh Rate
The Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 offers a higher refresh rate of 120 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Furthermore, the Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 boasts a faster response time of 1.0 ms, reducing motion blur for fast-paced content.

Brightness
Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 offer the same maximum brightness of 400 nits (cd/m²).

Brightness Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14

Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52

Min

Average

Max

Dell Pro Precision 7 14 vs Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 support the latest Wi-Fi standard v7.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 is equipped with 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. Pro Precision 7 14 does not have USB-A ports.
Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 have USB Type-C ports. Pro Precision 7 14 has 4x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 has 2x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 feature Thunderbolt ports. Pro Precision 7 14 has Thunderbolt 5, while Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 has Thunderbolt 4.

HDMI
Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 features an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors. Pro Precision 7 14 does not have an HDMI port.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both Pro Precision 7 14 and Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v7	v7
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v6.0	v5.4
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	No	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	4x USB 4.0	2x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 5	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	No	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Optional	Yes
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No