Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

16 inches | January 2023

Speed 8

Size 7

Display 8

Gaming 5.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

16.2 inches | January 2023

Speed 5.5

Size 7.5

Display 8.5

Gaming 3.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 Comparison Overview

Asus ROG Zephyrus Du...

See at AMAZON

Apple MacBook Pro 16...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Zephyrus Du...

See at AMAZON

Apple MacBook Pro 16...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023, two laptops from Asus and Apple. Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 was introduced to market in January 2023 and Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 was launched in January 2023. Both ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023 were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 Key Specs

Launched in January 2023
16.0" Mini LED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
GPU: GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB
16GB Ram
355 x 266 x 20.5-29.7 mm (13.98 x 10.47 x 0.81-1.17 inches)
Weight: 2.67 kg (5.89 lbs)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 Key Specs

Launched in January 2023
16.2" Mini LED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Apple M2 Pro
GPU: Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
16GB Ram
355.7 x 248.1 x 16.8 mm (14 x 9.77 x 0.66 inches)
Weight: 2.15 kg (4.74 lbs)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 was replaced by Apple Macbook Pro 16 2024. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Apple Macbook Pro 16 2024 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023
Apple Macbook Pro 16 2024 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 over Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

Refresh Rate	240 Hz vs 120 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
Max Brightness	1100 nits vs 500 nits	Brighter Screen
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 5 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	16.8 TFLOPS vs 6.8 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	More RAM Options
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	Easily increase the Storage when needed
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Fast way to input numbers
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No	Better typing feel
Key Travel	1.7 mm vs 1 mm

Reasons to choose Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 over Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Weight	2.15 kg vs 2.67 kg	0.52 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~86.2% vs ~78.6%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	3.4 mm vs 5.2 mm	1.8 mm thinner bezels
Display Size	16.2 inches vs 16 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Screen PPI	254 ppi vs 189 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	3456 x 2234 pixels vs 2560 x 1600 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Left	Flexible cable positions
Bluetooth	v5.3 vs v5.2	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Number of USB-C Ports	3x USB 4.0 vs 2x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.2	Faster USB-C connection
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port
Touchpad Size	15.5 x 9.9 cm vs 9.6 x 5.8 cm	Larger Touchpad Area
Avg. MSRP Price	$2400-2800 vs $4400-4800	Lower Price (*may change depending on config, seller, location, and time)

Common Strengths of Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 and Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Launch Dates	January 2023 vs January 2023	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Technology	Mini LED vs Mini LED	High Screen Quality
HDR Support	Yes, Dolby Vision vs Yes, Dolby Vision	Watch HDR Clips
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
USB Power Delivery	Yes vs Yes	Charging via USB port gives flexibility
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Dolby Atmos Support	Yes vs Yes	3D Surround Sound Support
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs Yes	Easy Login with Fingerprint Sensor
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 and Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023.

Physical Specs
Weight	2.67 kg (5.89 lbs)	2.15 kg (4.74 lbs)
Surface Area	944 cm2 (146.4 inches2)	882 cm2 (136.8 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~78.6%	~86.2%
Side Bezel Thickness	~5.2 mm	~3.4 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.17 kg/inch	0.13 kg/inch
	0.374 lbs/inch	0.286 lbs/inch
Colors	Black	Silver, Gray
Cover Opening Angle	130Â°	135Â°

Comparison of the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 External Dimensions

Weight

ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 weighs 2.67 kg (5.89 lbs), whereas the MacBook Pro 16 2023 weighs 2.15 kg (4.74 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

Min

Average

Max

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 is 0.17 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 is 0.13 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	Apple M2 Pro Apple M2 Max
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency	5.4 GHz
Number of Cores	16	12
Number of Threads	32	12
L3 Cache	64 MB
Integrated GPU	Radeon 610M	Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
CPU Fabrication Process	5 nm	5 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single)	2118	2004
Geekbench 5 (Multi)	19736	15111
Cinebench 23 (Single)	1961	1667
Cinebench 23 (Multi)	34381	14966

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

Laptops with: Apple M2 Pro

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 Compare

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile 12GB GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 16GB	Apple M2 Pro GPU (19-core)
Base Clock Frequency	1545 MHz	450 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1890 MHz	1398 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	140 W	35 W
Nvidia Optimus	MUX
Type	Dedicated	Integrated
FLOPS	16.8 TFLOPS	6.8 TFLOPS
Memory Size	8 GB	System Shared
Memory Type	GDDR6	LPDDR5
Memory Bus	128 bit	256 bit
Memory Speed	~16 Gbps	6.4 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	3072	2432
TMUs	96	152
ROPs	48	76

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 has a FLOPS value of 16.8 TFLOPS whereas the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 ' has a FLOPS value of 6.8 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 32GB 64GB	16GB 32GB 64GB 96GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	4800 MHz	6400 MHz
RAM Type	DDR5	LPDDR5
Upgradable	Yes	No
Max RAM Size	64 GB
Total Slots	2

Both laptops, the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and the MacBook Pro 16 2023, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (2023)	Apple MacBook Pro 16 (2023)
CPU	AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	Apple M2 Pro (NPU)
GPU	GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB	Apple GPU (Metal, unified memory)
Memory	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM	16 GB
Available for LLM total	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 (2023)|Apple MacBook Pro 16 (2023)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	90 Wh	100 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	Yes	No
USB Power Delivery	Yes	Yes
Charging Port Position	Left	Left, Right
Charge Power	330 W	140 W
Full Charging Time	1:48 hr	1:25 hr

On the other hand, the MacBook Pro 16 2023 features a higher battery capacity of 100 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023's 90 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

Min

Average

Max

STORAGE
The MacBook Pro 16 2023 offers a larger max storage capacity of 8 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023's storage capacity of 4 TB.

Storage Options	1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB, 8 TB
Upgradable	Yes	No
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	Custom

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 has a display size of 16.0".On the other hand, MacBook Pro 16 2023 has a larger16.2" display.The total usable screen area of the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 is 742cm² / 115inch² whereas the MacBook Pro 16 2023's total usable screen area is 761cm² / 118inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the MacBook Pro 16 2023 features a higher pixel density with 254 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

Min

Average

Max

Refresh Rate
The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 offers a higher refresh rate of 240 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Brightness
The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 offers a higher maximum brightness of 1100 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023

Min

Average

Max

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 vs Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both laptops offer the same Wi-Fi standard (v6E), ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 is equipped with 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. MacBook Pro 16 2023 does not have USB-A ports.
Both ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023 have USB Type-C ports. ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 has 2x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports, while MacBook Pro 16 2023 has 3x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
MacBook Pro 16 2023 is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 2023 and MacBook Pro 16 2023 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5.3
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	No
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 3.2	3x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	Yes
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	Yes	No
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	Yes