Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

14.2 inches | October 2025

Speed 7.5

Size 8.5

Display 9

Gaming 4.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

16 inches | January 2025

Speed 6.5

Size 5

Display 7.5

Gaming 5

CHECK AT AMAZON

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 Comparison Overview

Apple MacBook Pro 14...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Zephyrus G1...

See at AMAZON

Apple MacBook Pro 14...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Zephyrus G1...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605, two laptops from Apple and Asus. Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 was introduced to market in October 2025 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 was launched in January 2025. There is only 9 months difference between MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 Key Specs

Launched in October 2025
14.2" Mini LED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Apple M5 (10-Core)
GPU: Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
16GB Ram
312.6 x 221.2 x 15.5 mm (12.31 x 8.71 x 0.61 inches)
Weight: 1.55 kg (3.42 lbs)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 Key Specs

Launched in January 2025
16.0" OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i7 14650HX
GPU: GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
16GB Ram
354 x 246 x 14.9-17.4 mm (13.94 x 9.69 x 0.59-0.69 inches)
Weight: 1.95 kg (4.3 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 over Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

Weight	1.55 kg vs 1.95 kg	0.4 kg lighter
Side Bezel Thickness	3.4 mm vs 4.7 mm	1.3 mm thinner bezels
Noise Level	48 dB vs 68 dB	Less fan noise
Screen PPI	254 ppi vs 189 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	3024 x 1964 pixels vs 2560 x 1600 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Max Brightness	1000 nits vs 500 nits	Brighter Screen
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 4 nm	Newer Generation GPU
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs No	Easy login with fingerprint
Number of USB-C Ports	3x USB 4.0 vs 2x USB 4.0	Connect more device at the same time

Reasons to choose Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 over Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~85.2% vs ~84.6%	Larger screen area ratio
Display Size	16 inches vs 14.2 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Refresh Rate	240 Hz vs 120 Hz	Smoother media experience
Adobe RGB Profile	98.1% vs 88.8%	Wider Adobe RGB Coverage
Response Time	1 ms vs 48 ms	Faster Response screen
GPU FLOPS	18.4 TFLOPS vs 5.7 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	Easily increase the Storage when needed
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs No	More advanced Wi-fi connectivity
WiFi Standard	v7 vs v6E	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth	v5.4 vs v5.3	Better typing feel
Key Travel	1.7 mm vs 1 mm

Common Strengths of Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 and Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Launch Dates	October 2025 vs January 2025	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Technology	Mini LED vs OLED	High Screen Quality
HDR Support	Yes, Dolby Vision vs Yes, Dolby Vision	Watch HDR Clips
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Left, Right	Flexible charging positions
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Dolby Atmos Support	Yes vs Yes	3D Surround Sound Support
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v4	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 and Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
Upgradable RAM	No vs No	No Option to increase the RAM size

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.55 kg (3.42 lbs)	1.95 kg (4.3 lbs)
Surface Area	691 cm2 (107.2 inches2)	871 cm2 (135.1 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~84.6%	~85.2%
Side Bezel Thickness	~3.4 mm	~4.7 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.11 kg/inch	0.12 kg/inch
	0.242 lbs/inch	0.264 lbs/inch
Colors	Black, Silver	White, Black
Cover Opening Angle	135°	130°

Comparison of the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 External Dimensions

Weight

MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 weighs 1.55 kg (3.42 lbs), whereas the ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 weighs 1.95 kg (4.3 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Thickness Comparison

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 is 0.11 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 is 0.12 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Apple M5 (10-Core)	Intel Core i7 14650HX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
Base Frequency	4.61 GHz	2.2 GHz
Number of Cores	10 (4P + 6E)	16 (8P + 8E)
Number of Threads	10	24
Integrated GPU	Apple M5 (10-core)	Intel UHD Graphics (16EU)
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm	10 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Apple M5 (10-Core)

Laptops with: Intel Core i7 14650HX

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Apple M5 (10-core)	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 16GB GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB
Boost CLock Frequency	2240 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)		115 W
Type	Integrated	Dedicated
FLOPS	5.7 TFLOPS	18.4 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	8 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	GDDR7
Memory Bus	128 bit	128 bit
Memory Speed	9.6 Gbps	~24 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	1280	3328
TMUs	80	104
ROPs	40	48

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 has a FLOPS value of 5.7 TFLOPS whereas the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 ' has a FLOPS value of 18.4 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 24GB 32GB	16GB 32GB 64GB
RAM Clock	9600 MHz	7467 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Upgradable	No	No

Both laptops, the MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and the ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M5, 2025)	Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605
CPU	Apple M5 (10-Core) (NPU)	Intel Core i7 14650HX
GPU	Apple GPU (Metal, unified memory)	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
Memory	16 GB	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Apple MacBook Pro 14 (M5, 2025)|Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	72.4 Wh	90 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	No
Charging Port Position	Left, Right	Left, Right
Charge Power	70 / 96 W	240 W
Full Charging Time	1:30 hr
Cable Length	2 meters

On the other hand, the ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 features a higher battery capacity of 90 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025's 72 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

STORAGE
Both laptops, the MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and the ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 have similar max. storage capacities of 4 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB	1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB
Upgradable	No	Yes
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	Custom	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 has a display size of 14.2".On the other hand, ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 has a larger16.0" display.The total usable screen area of the MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 is 585cm² / 91inch² whereas the ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605's total usable screen area is 742cm² / 115inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 features a higher pixel density with 254 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Refresh Rate
The ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 offers a higher refresh rate of 240 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Furthermore, the ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 boasts a faster response time of 1.0 ms, reducing motion blur for fast-paced content.

Brightness
The MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 offers a higher maximum brightness of 1000 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v7, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 (v6E).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 is equipped with 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 does not have USB-A ports.
Both MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 have USB Type-C ports. MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 has 3x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 are equipped with Thunderbolt 4 ports.

HDMI
Both MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025 and ROG Zephyrus G16 2025 GU605 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v7
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.3	v5.4
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	No	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	3x USB 4.0	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	Yes