Apple MacBook Neo vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Apple MacBook Neo

13 inches | March 2026

Speed 5.5

Size 9

Display 5

Gaming 3

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

15.6 inches | January 2023

Speed 5

Size 7.5

Display 5

Gaming 3

CHECK AT AMAZON

Apple MacBook Neo vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 Comparison Overview

Apple MacBook Neo

See at AMAZON

Asus TUF Gaming A15...

See at AMAZON

Apple MacBook Neo

See at AMAZON

Asus TUF Gaming A15...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing MacBook Neo and TUF Gaming A15 2023, two laptops from Apple and Asus. Apple MacBook Neo was introduced to market in March 2026 and Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 was launched in January 2023. As you can see, TUF Gaming A15 2023 is 3 years older than MacBook Neo. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Apple MacBook Neo and Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Apple MacBook Neo Key Specs

Launched in March 2026
13.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Apple A18 Pro (MacBook)
GPU: Apple A18 Pro GPU
8GB Ram
297.5 x 206.4 x 12.7 mm (11.71 x 8.13 x 0.5 inches)
Weight: 1.23 kg (2.71 lbs)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 Key Specs

Launched in January 2023
15.6" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
GPU: GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 6GB
8GB Ram
354 x 251 x 22.4-24.9 mm (13.94 x 9.88 x 0.88-0.98 inches)
Weight: 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how MacBook Neo and TUF Gaming A15 2023 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Apple MacBook Neo over Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

Weight	1.23 kg vs 2.20 kg	0.97 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~79.8% vs ~75.5%	Larger screen area ratio
Screen PPI	218 ppi vs 141 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	2408 x 1506 pixels vs 1920 x 1080 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Adobe RGB Profile	72.6% vs 66.6%	Wider Adobe RGB Coverage
Max Brightness	500 nits vs 250 nits	Brighter Screen
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 6 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 8 nm	Newer Generation GPU
Bluetooth	v6.0 vs v5.3	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Camera

Reasons to choose Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 over Apple MacBook Neo

Side Bezel Thickness	4.3 mm vs 8.8 mm	4.5 mm thinner bezels
Display Size	15.6 inches vs 13 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Refresh Rate	144 Hz vs 60 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
sRGB Color Space	100% vs 97.9%	Wider sRGB Color Space Coverage
DCI-P3 Color Gamut	100% vs 72.2%	Wider DCI-P3 Color Gamut
Response Time	7 ms vs 18 ms	Faster Response screen
GPU FLOPS	7.12 TFLOPS vs 2.3 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	More RAM Options
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	Easily increase the Storage when needed
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs No	Faster USB-C connection
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.2	Connect to external monitors directly via HDMI cable
HDMI Port	1x HDMI 2.1 vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Fast way to input numbers
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No	Easily see the keys under low light
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs No	Better typing feel
Key Travel	1.7 mm vs 1 mm

Common Strengths of Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 and Apple MacBook Neo

Launch Dates	March 2026 vs January 2023	Both laptops are recent models
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Dolby Atmos Support	Yes vs Yes	3D Surround Sound Support
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable

Common Weaknesses of Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 and Apple MacBook Neo

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability

Apple MacBook Neo vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Apple MacBook Neo and the Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.23 kg (2.71 lbs)	2.2 kg (4.85 lbs)
Surface Area	614 cm2 (95.2 inches2)	889 cm2 (137.7 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~79.8%	~75.5%
Side Bezel Thickness	~8.8 mm	~4.3 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.09 kg/inch	0.14 kg/inch
	0.198 lbs/inch	0.308 lbs/inch
Colors	Silver, Blue, Pink, Yellow	Gray
Cover Opening Angle	135°	145Â°

Comparison of the Apple MacBook Neo and the Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 External Dimensions

Weight

MacBook Neo weighs 1.23 kg (2.71 lbs), whereas the TUF Gaming A15 2023 weighs 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Apple MacBook Neo

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Thickness Comparison

Apple MacBook Neo

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Apple MacBook Neo is 0.09 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 is 0.14 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Apple MacBook Neo vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Apple A18 Pro (MacBook)	AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Base Frequency	2 GHz	3.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.05 GHz	4.75 GHz
Number of Cores	6 (2P + 4E)	8
Number of Threads	6	16
Integrated GPU	Apple A18 Pro GPU	Radeon 680M
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm	6 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Apple MacBook Neo and Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPU ( AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ) and compare them:

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Apple A18 Pro GPU	GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 6GB GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6GB GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB
Boost CLock Frequency	1490 MHz	1740 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)		95 W
Type	Integrated	Dedicated
FLOPS	2.3 TFLOPS	7.12 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	6 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory Bus	128 bit	128 bit
Memory Speed	7.5 Gbps	12 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	768	2048
TMUs	40	64

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Apple MacBook Neo has a FLOPS value of 2.3 TFLOPS whereas the Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 ' has a FLOPS value of 7.12 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB	8GB 16GB 32GB
Memory Bus	2x4 GB	1x8 GB
RAM Clock	7500 MHz	4800 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	DDR5
Upgradable	No	Yes

Both laptops, the MacBook Neo and the TUF Gaming A15 2023, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Apple MacBook Neo	Asus TUF Gaming A15 (2023)
CPU	Apple A18 Pro (MacBook) (NPU)	AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
GPU	Apple GPU (Metal, unified memory)	GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 6GB
Memory	8 GB	8 GB ; 6 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)	~10 GB (4.5 GB VRAM 5.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 3.5 GB RAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 6 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✔ Modest Speed doesn't fit in 6 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 6 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Apple MacBook Neo|Asus TUF Gaming A15 (2023)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	36.5 Wh	90 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	Yes
Charging Port Position	Left	Left
Charge Power	20 W	200 / 240 W
Full Charging Time	2:00 hr	1:46 hr
Cable Length	1.5 meters

On the other hand, the TUF Gaming A15 2023 features a higher battery capacity of 90 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the MacBook Neo's 37 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Apple MacBook Neo

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

STORAGE
The TUF Gaming A15 2023 offers a larger max storage capacity of 4 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the MacBook Neo's storage capacity of 512 GB.

Storage Options	256 GB, 512 GB	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 4 TB
Upgradable	No	Yes
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	Custom	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Apple MacBook Neo vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Apple MacBook Neo and Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. MacBook Neo has a display size of 13.0".On the other hand, TUF Gaming A15 2023 has a larger15.6" display.The total usable screen area of the MacBook Neo is 490cm² / 76inch² whereas the TUF Gaming A15 2023's total usable screen area is 670cm² / 104inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the MacBook Neo features a higher pixel density with 218 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Apple MacBook Neo

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Refresh Rate
The TUF Gaming A15 2023 offers a higher refresh rate of 144 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Furthermore, the TUF Gaming A15 2023 boasts a faster response time of 7.0 ms, reducing motion blur for fast-paced content.

Brightness
The MacBook Neo offers a higher maximum brightness of 500 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Apple MacBook Neo

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

Apple MacBook Neo vs Asus TUF Gaming A15 2023 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
MacBook Neo features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v6E, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to TUF Gaming A15 2023 (v6).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
TUF Gaming A15 2023 is equipped with 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. MacBook Neo does not have USB-A ports.
Both MacBook Neo and TUF Gaming A15 2023 have USB Type-C ports. MacBook Neo has 2x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports, while TUF Gaming A15 2023 has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Neither MacBook Neo nor TUF Gaming A15 2023 has Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
TUF Gaming A15 2023 features an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors. MacBook Neo does not have an HDMI port.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Neither MacBook Neo nor TUF Gaming A15 2023 has an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both MacBook Neo and TUF Gaming A15 2023 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v6.0	v5.3
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	No	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 3.2	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	No
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	No	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Optional	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	Yes
SD CardReader	No	No
Proprietary Charging Port	No	Yes