Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

14.5 inches | May 2025

Speed 5

Size 8.5

Display 7.5

Gaming 3.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

16 inches | February 2025

Speed 7

Size 4

Display 7.5

Gaming 5.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI Comparison Overview

Acer Swift X 14 SFX1...

See at AMAZON

Acer Predator Helios...

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift X 14 SFX1...

See at AMAZON

Acer Predator Helios...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI, two laptops by Acer. Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G was introduced to market in May 2025 and Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI was launched in February 2025. There is only 3 months difference between Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI are members of Acer's series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

Acer Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T	January 2026	16.0"	355.25 x 245.4 x 14.85 mm	1.55 kg (3.42 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 16 AI SFE16-I51	January 2026	16.0"	357.15 x 244.64 x 14.6 mm	1.25 kg (2.76 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-I51	January 2026	14.0"	315 x 218.6 x 13.9 mm	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)
Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-71	August 2025	15.6"	362.9 x 237.5 x 19.9 mm	1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52	May 2025	14.0"	321.8 x 221 x 17.31 mm	1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71	May 2025	14.5"	323.9 x 254.7 x 20.8 mm	1.9 kg (4.19 lbs)
Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75	May 2025	14.0"	312.4 x 227.4 x 9.7 mm	1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)
Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G	May 2025	14.5"	322.4 x 227.4 x 9.76-17.96 mm	1.57 kg (3.46 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G Key Specs

Launched in May 2025
14.5" OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
GPU: GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB
16GB Ram
322.4 x 227.4 x 9.76-17.96 mm (12.69 x 8.95 x 0.38-0.71 inches)
Weight: 1.57 kg (3.46 lbs)

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI Key Specs

Launched in February 2025
16.0" OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
GPU: GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
16GB Ram
360.1 x 271.09 x 12 mm (14.18 x 10.67 x 0.47 inches)
Weight: 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G over Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Weight	1.57 kg vs 2.30 kg	0.73 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~83.2% vs ~76%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	5 mm vs 7.8 mm	2.8 mm thinner bezels
Screen PPI	234 ppi vs 189 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	2880 x 1800 pixels vs 2560 x 1600 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Number of Microphones	3 vs 2	Better Sound capture

Reasons to choose Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI over Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Display Size	16 inches vs 14.5 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Refresh Rate	165 Hz vs 120 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 4 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 5 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	18.4 TFLOPS vs 12.6 TFLOPS	More RAM Options
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	Connect more device at the same time
Number of USB-A Ports	3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs No	Fast way to input numbers
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No

Common Strengths of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI and Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Launch Dates	May 2025 vs February 2025	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Technology	OLED vs OLED	High Screen Quality
HDR Support	Yes, HDR10 vs Yes, HDR10	Watch HDR Clips
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	LPDDR5X vs DDR5	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI and Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.57 kg (3.46 lbs)	2.3 kg (5.07 lbs)
Surface Area	733 cm² (113.6 inches²)	976 cm2 (151.3 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~83.2%	~76%
Side Bezel Thickness	~5 mm	~7.8 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.11 kg/inch	0.14 kg/inch
	0.242 lbs/inch	0.308 lbs/inch
Colors	Black	Blue

Comparison of the Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI External Dimensions

Weight

Swift X 14 SFX14-61G weighs 1.57 kg (3.46 lbs), whereas the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI weighs 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G is 0.11 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI is 0.14 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350	Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
Base Frequency	2.0 GHz	2.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.8 GHz	5.2 GHz
Number of Cores	6 (3P + 3E)	20 (8P + 12E)
Number of Threads	12	20
L3 Cache	16 MB	30 MB
Integrated GPU	Radeon 840M	Arc Graphics (4-Cores)
CPU Fabrication Process	4 nm	3 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen AI 5 340

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 12GB	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop 8GB GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	90 W	115 W
Type	Dedicated	Dedicated
FLOPS	12.6 TFLOPS	18.4 TFLOPS
Memory Size	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR7
Memory Bus	128 bit	128 bit
Memory Speed	~24 Gbps	~24 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	2560	3328
TMUs	80	104
ROPs	32	48

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G has a FLOPS value of 12.6 TFLOPS whereas the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI ' has a FLOPS value of 18.4 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 32GB	16GB 32GB 64GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	7500 MHz	6400 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	DDR5
Upgradable	No	Yes

Both laptops, the Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Swift X 14 (SFX14-61G)	Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI
CPU	AMD Ryzen AI 5 340	Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
GPU	GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 8GB	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop 8GB
Memory	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM	16 GB ; 8 GB VRAM
Available for LLM total	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)	~19.3 GB (6.5 GB VRAM 12.8 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 8 GB VRAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	⚠ Borderline / Slow doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)	! Not Practical doesn't fit in 8 GB VRAM, spills to RAM (VRAM + RAM, slower)
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Swift X 14 (SFX14-61G)|Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	76 Wh	76 Wh 90 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	Yes
Charging Port Position	Left	Bottom
Charge Power	100 W	330 / 230 W

Furthermore, both laptops have the same battery capacity of 76 Wh, ensuring comparable battery performance.

Battery Comparison

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

STORAGE
Both laptops, the Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI have similar max. storage capacities of 2 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB	1 TB, 2 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	1	2
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Swift X 14 SFX14-61G has a display size of 14.5".On the other hand, Predator Helios Neo 16S AI has a larger16.0" display.The total usable screen area of the Swift X 14 SFX14-61G is 610cm² / 94inch² whereas the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI's total usable screen area is 742cm² / 115inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Swift X 14 SFX14-61G features a higher pixel density with 234 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Refresh Rate
The Predator Helios Neo 16S AI offers a higher refresh rate of 165 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI boast the same response time of 1.0 ms.

Brightness
Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI offer the same maximum brightness of 500 nits (cd/m²).

Brightness Comparison

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both laptops offer the same Wi-Fi standard (v6E), ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI have USB-A ports. Swift X 14 SFX14-61G has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while Predator Helios Neo 16S AI has 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI feature 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. Swift X 14 SFX14-61G does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both Swift X 14 SFX14-61G and Predator Helios Neo 16S AI are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.4	v5.4
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	Thunderbolt 4
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Optional	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	Yes
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	Yes