Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 vs Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

16 inches | Screen-to-body ratio:

Speed 5

Size 8.5

Display 3.5

Gaming 2.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

14 inches | May 2025

Speed 5

Size 9

Display 4

Gaming 3

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 vs Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 Comparison Overview

Acer Swift Go 16 AI...

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift Go 14 AI...

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift Go 16 AI...

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift Go 14 AI...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75, two laptops by Acer. Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 was introduced to market in January and Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 was launched in May 2025. As you can see, Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 is 55 years older than Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 are members of Acer's series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

Acer Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T	January 2026	16.0"	355.25 x 245.4 x 14.85 mm	1.55 kg (3.42 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 16 AI SFE16-I51	January 2026	16.0"	357.15 x 244.64 x 14.6 mm	1.25 kg (2.76 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-I51	January 2026	14.0"	315 x 218.6 x 13.9 mm	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)
Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-71	August 2025	15.6"	362.9 x 237.5 x 19.9 mm	1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52	May 2025	14.0"	321.8 x 221 x 17.31 mm	1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71	May 2025	14.5"	323.9 x 254.7 x 20.8 mm	1.9 kg (4.19 lbs)
Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75	May 2025	14.0"	312.4 x 227.4 x 9.7 mm	1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)
Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G	May 2025	14.5"	322.4 x 227.4 x 9.76-17.96 mm	1.57 kg (3.46 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 Key Specs

Launched in January 1970
16.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
GPU: Intel Arc 130V
16GB Ram
355.5 x 250.6 x 15.99 mm (14 x 9.87 x 0.63 inches)
Weight: 1.52 kg (3.35 lbs)

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 Key Specs

Launched in May 2025
14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
GPU: Intel Arc 140V
16GB Ram
312.4 x 227.4 x 9.7 mm (12.3 x 8.95 x 0.38 inches)
Weight: 1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 over Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~83.3% vs ~80%	Larger screen area ratio
Display Size	16 inches vs 14 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs No	Easy login with fingerprint
Webcam Resolution	2560 x 1440 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Camera
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port
Numeric Pad	Yes vs No	Fast way to input numbers

Reasons to choose Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 over Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Weight	1.24 kg vs 1.52 kg	0.28 kg lighter
Screen PPI	162 ppi vs 142 ppi	More pixels per inch
GPU FLOPS	4 TFLOPS vs 3.3 TFLOPS

Common Strengths of Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 and Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Screen Coating	Matte vs Matte	Less reflections on the screen
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5X	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Built-in SD Card Reader	Yes vs Yes	Read & Write SD Cards
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 and Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support
Upgradable RAM	No vs No	No Option to increase the RAM size

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 vs Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and the Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.52 kg (3.35 lbs)	1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)
Surface Area	891 cm2 (138.2 inches2)	710 cm2 (110.1 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~83.3%	~80%
Side Bezel Thickness	~5.4 mm	~5.4 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.10 kg/inch	0.09 kg/inch
	0.22 lbs/inch	0.198 lbs/inch
Colors	Black, Gray	Gray, Blue
Cover Opening Angle	180°	180°

Comparison of the Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and the Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 External Dimensions

Weight

Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 weighs 1.52 kg (3.35 lbs), whereas the Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 weighs 1.24 kg (2.73 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 is 0.10 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 is 0.09 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Base Clock Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1850 MHz	1950 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	30 W	30 W
Type	Integrated	Integrated
FLOPS	3.3 TFLOPS	4 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Memory Speed	8.53 Gbps	8.53 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	896	1024

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 has a FLOPS value of 3.3 TFLOPS whereas the Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 ' has a FLOPS value of 4 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 32GB	16GB 32GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	8533 MHz	8533 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Upgradable	No	No

Both laptops, the Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and the Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Swift Go 16 AI (SFG16-74)	Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED (SFG14-75)
CPU	Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (NPU - 40 TOPS)	Intel Core Ultra 7 256V (NPU - 47 TOPS)
GPU	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	Intel Arc Graphics 140V
Memory	16 GB	16 GB
Available for LLM total	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Swift Go 16 AI (SFG16-74)|Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED (SFG14-75)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	75 Wh	0 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	No
Charging Port Position	Left	Left
Charge Power	100 W	100 W

Moreover, the Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 boasts a larger battery capacity of 75 Wh, offering extended usage time compared to the Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75's0 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

STORAGE
With a larger storage capacity up to 2 TB, the Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 provides more space for storing files and applications compared to the Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75's max. storage capacity of 1 TB.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB	512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	1	1
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 vs Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 has a display size of 16.0".On the other hand, Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 has a smaller 14.0" display.The total usable screen area of the Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 is 742cm² / 115inch² whereas the Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75's total usable screen area is 568cm² / 88inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 features a higher pixel density with 162 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Avg: 16.0-16.9"

Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Refresh Rate
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 offer the same refresh rate of 60 Hz.

Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 vs Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 support the latest Wi-Fi standard v7.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 feature 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 feature 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 come with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards.

Audio Jack
Both Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 and Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v7	v7
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.4	v5.4
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	No
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	Yes	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No

Popular Comparisons of Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74

Here are the four most popular comparisons of the Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-74 amongst Laptop Decision readers.

Asus Vivobook S16 S3..

Compare

Asus ROG Strix G16 2..

Compare

HP Omen Max 16

Compare

Asus ExpertBook B5 B..

Compare

Popular Comparisons of Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75

Also you will find below the four most popular comparisons of the Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75 amongst Laptop Decision readers.

Asus ROG Strix G16 2..

Compare

Razer Blade 16 2025

Compare

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 ..

Compare

Acer Swift Go 16 SFG..

Compare

Laptops by Brand

Acer Laptops

Apple Laptops

ASUS Laptops

Dell Laptops

Gigabyte Laptops

Honor Laptops

HP Laptops

Huawei Laptops

Lenovo Laptops

LG Laptops

Microsoft Laptops

MSI Laptops

Razer Laptops

Samsung Laptops

Latest Windows Laptops

Framework Laptop 13 Pro
April 2026 | 13.5 inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 16
March 2026 | 16.0 inches

Dell Pro 14 Premium 2026
March 2026 | 14.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2i 16"
March 2026 | 16.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2a 16"
March 2026 | 16.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2i 14"
March 2026 | 14.0 inches

HP ZBook 8 G2a 14"
| inches

Dell Pro Precision 7 14
March 2026 | 14.0 inches

Latest Apple Laptops

Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 2026
March 2026 | 13.6 inches

Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 2026
March 2026 | 15.3 inches

Apple MacBook Neo
March 2026 | 13.0 inches

Apple MacBook Pro 16 M5, 2026
March 2026 | 16.2 inches

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2026
March 2026 | 14.2 inches

Apple MacBook Pro 14 M5, 2025
October 2025 | 14.2 inches

Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 2025
March 2025 | 15.3 inches

Apple MacBook Air 13 M4 2025
March 2025 | 13.6 inches

Latest Gaming Laptops

Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 2025 G635
January 2025 | 16.0 inches

Asus ROG Strix SCAR 18 2025 G835
January 2025 | 18.0 inches

Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61
September 2024 | 14.5 inches

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608
June 2024 | 16.0 inches

Asus TUF Gaming A14 FA401
June 2024 | 14.0 inches

Latest Convertible Laptops

Lenovo IdeaPad 5x 2-in-1 Gen 11 14 14Q8Y11
April 2026 | 14.0 inches

Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407
January 2026 | 14.0 inches

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 2-in-1 Gen 11 Aura Edition
January 2026 | 14.0 inches

MSI Prestige 16 Flip AI+ C3M
January 2026 | 16.0 inches

MSI Prestige 14 Flip AI+ D3M
January 2026 | 14.0 inches

Latest Workstation Laptops

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 15
January 2025 | 15.3 inches

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches

HP ZBook Ultra 14 G1a
January 2025 | 14.0 inches

Dell Pro 13
January 2025 | 13.3 inches

Dell Pro 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches

Latest Ultralight Laptops

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
1.21 kg (2.67 lbs) | 13.0 mm

Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
0.9 kg (1.98 lbs) | 15.9 mm

Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i 14 Gen 10
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
1.23 kg (2.71 lbs) | 14.6 mm

Dell Pro 13
January 2025 | 13.3 inches
1.07 kg (2.36 lbs) | 18.0 mm

Dell Pro 14
January 2025 | 14.0 inches
1.14 kg (2.51 lbs) | 18.0 mm

Latest Thin&Light Laptops

Samsung Galaxy Book 5 Pro 16
February 2025 | 16.0 inches
1.56 kg (3.44 lbs) | 12.5 mm

Lenovo ThinkPad X9 Gen 1 Aura Edition 15
January 2025 | 15.3 inches
1.4 kg (3.09 lbs) | 12.9 mm

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition 15 Intel
September 2024 | 15.3 inches
1.46 kg (3.22 lbs) | 15.2 mm

Lenovo ThinkBook 16 Gen 7 QOY Snapdragon
September 2024 | 16.0 inches
1.82 kg (4.01 lbs) | 16.7 mm

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14" AMD Gen 9
September 2024 | 14.5 inches
1.54 kg (3.4 lbs) | 16.6 mm

Latest ChromeOS Laptops

Acer Chromebook 516 GE
October 2022 | 16.0 inches

Acer Chromebook 512
January 2022 | 12.0 inches

Acer Chromebook 314
January 2022 | 14.0 inches

Acer Chromebook 311
January 2022 | 11.6 inches

CPU Model	Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Intel Core Ultra 5 228V Intel Core Ultra 5 236V Intel Core Ultra 5 238V Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Core Ultra 7 266V Intel Core Ultra 7 268V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V	Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Base Frequency	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz
Number of Cores	8 (4P + 4E)	8 (4P + 4E)
Number of Threads	8	8
L3 Cache	8 MB	12 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	Intel Arc Graphics 140V
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm	3 nm