Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

14 inches | July 2025

Speed 4.5

Size 9.5

Display 8

Gaming 2.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

13.4 inches | January 2025

Speed 7.5

Size 7.5

Display 7.5

Gaming 6

CHECK AT AMAZON

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 Comparison Overview

Acer Swift Edge 14 A...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Flow Z13 20...

See at AMAZON

Acer Swift Edge 14 A...

See at AMAZON

Asus ROG Flow Z13 20...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302, two laptops from Acer and Asus. Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 was introduced to market in January and Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 was launched in January 2025. As you can see, Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 is 55 years older than ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 are members of Asus's series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

Acer Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-71T	January 2026	16.0"	355.25 x 245.4 x 14.85 mm	1.55 kg (3.42 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 16 AI SFE16-I51	January 2026	16.0"	357.15 x 244.64 x 14.6 mm	1.25 kg (2.76 lbs)
Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-I51	January 2026	14.0"	315 x 218.6 x 13.9 mm	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)
Acer Aspire Go 15 AG15-71	August 2025	15.6"	362.9 x 237.5 x 19.9 mm	1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52	May 2025	14.0"	321.8 x 221 x 17.31 mm	1.6 kg (3.53 lbs)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 AI PHN14-71	May 2025	14.5"	323.9 x 254.7 x 20.8 mm	1.9 kg (4.19 lbs)
Acer Swift Go 14 AI OLED SFG14-75	May 2025	14.0"	312.4 x 227.4 x 9.7 mm	1.24 kg (2.73 lbs)
Acer Swift X 14 SFX14-61G	May 2025	14.5"	322.4 x 227.4 x 9.76-17.96 mm	1.57 kg (3.46 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 Key Specs

Launched in January 1970
14.0" TouchScreen - OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
GPU: Intel Arc 130V
16GB Ram
313.7 x 229.2 x 9.3-16.6 mm (12.35 x 9.02 x 0.37-0.65 inches)
Weight: 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 Key Specs

Launched in January 2025
13.4" Touchscreen - IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
GPU: Radeon 8050S
16GB Ram
300 x 204 x 12.9-14.9 mm (11.81 x 8.03 x 0.51-0.59 inches)
Weight: 1.2 kg (2.65 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 over Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

Weight	0.99 kg vs 1.20 kg	0.21 kg lighter
Display Size	14 inches vs 13.4 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Contrast Rate	1000000:1 vs 1727:1	more pleasing colors
Screen PPI	243 ppi vs 225 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	2880 x 1800 pixels vs 2560 x 1600 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
sRGB Color Space	100% vs 99.6%	Wider sRGB Color Space Coverage
Response Time	1 ms vs 3 ms	Faster Response screen
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 4 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	3 nm vs 4 nm	Newer Generation GPU
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes vs No	Easy login with fingerprint
Number of USB-A Ports	2x USB 3.2 vs 1x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port

Reasons to choose Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 over Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~85.1% vs ~79%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	5.7 mm vs 6.1 mm	0.4 mm thinner bezels
Refresh Rate	180 Hz vs 120 Hz	Smoother media experience
GPU FLOPS	22.9 TFLOPS vs 3.3 TFLOPS	3D Surround Sound Support
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No

Common Strengths of Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 and Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Screen Type	Touch Screen vs Touch Screen	Interact with your fingers
HDR Support	Yes, HDR10 vs Yes, Dolby Vision	Watch HDR Clips
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	LPDDR5X vs LPDDR5X	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.1 vs 1x HDMI 2.1	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 and Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Upgradable RAM	No vs No	No Option to increase the RAM size

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and the Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302.

Physical Specs
Weight	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)	1.2 kg (2.65 lbs)
Surface Area	719 cm2 (111.4 inches2)	612 cm2 (94.8 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~79%	~85.1%
Side Bezel Thickness	~6.1 mm	~5.7 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.07 kg/inch	0.09 kg/inch
	0.154 lbs/inch	0.198 lbs/inch
Colors	White	Black

Comparison of the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and the Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 External Dimensions

Weight

Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 weighs 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs), whereas the ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 weighs 1.2 kg (2.65 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Thickness Comparison

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 is 0.07 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 is 0.09 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core Ultra 5 226V Intel Core Ultra 5 228V Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V	AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395
Base Frequency	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.5 GHz	5 GHz
Number of Cores	8 (4P + 4E)	12
Number of Threads	8	24
L3 Cache	8 MB	64 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon 8050S
CPU Fabrication Process	3 nm	4 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen AI Max 390

HP ZBook Ultra 14 G1a Compare

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon 8050S
Base Clock Frequency	600 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1850 MHz	2800 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	30 W	45-120 W
Type	Integrated	Integrated
FLOPS	3.3 TFLOPS	22.9 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Memory Speed	8.53 Gbps	8 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	896	2048

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 has a FLOPS value of 3.3 TFLOPS whereas the Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 ' has a FLOPS value of 22.9 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	16GB 32GB	16GB 32GB 64GB 128GB
Memory Bus	2x8 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	8533 MHz	8000 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Upgradable	No	No

Both laptops, the Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and the ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302, come with similar RAM capacities of 16 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Swift Edge 14 AI (SFE14-51)	Asus ROG Flow Z13 (2025) GZ302
CPU	Intel Core Ultra 5 226V (NPU - 40 TOPS)	AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 (NPU - 50 TOPS)
GPU	Intel Arc Graphics 130V	Radeon 8050S
Memory	16 GB	16 GB
Available for LLM total	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)	~10.5 GB (10.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Runs Well fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Runs Smoothly fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Runs Well fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 10.5 GB RAM	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 10.5 GB RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI (SFE14-51)|Asus ROG Flow Z13 (2025) GZ302

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	65 Wh	70 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	No
Charging Port Position	Left	Left
Charge Power	100 W	200 W

On the other hand, the ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 features a higher battery capacity of 70 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51's 65 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

STORAGE
Both laptops, the Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and the ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 have similar max. storage capacities of 2 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB	1 TB, 2 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	1	1
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 has a display size of 14.0".On the other hand, ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 has a smaller 13.4" display.The total usable screen area of the Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 is 568cm² / 88inch² whereas the ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302's total usable screen area is 521cm² / 81inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 features a higher pixel density with 243 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Refresh Rate
The ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 offers a higher refresh rate of 180 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Furthermore, the Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 boasts a faster response time of 1.0 ms, reducing motion blur for fast-paced content.

Brightness
Both Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 offer the same maximum brightness of 500 nits (cd/m²).

Brightness Comparison

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Acer Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 support the latest Wi-Fi standard v7.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 have USB-A ports. Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 has 1x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 feature 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.1) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Swift Edge 14 AI SFE14-51 and ROG Flow Z13 2025 GZ302 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v7	v7
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.4	v5.4
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	1x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	No
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.1	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Yes	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	No	Yes
Proprietary Charging Port	No	Yes