MSI GF65 Thin vs MSI GF75 Thin Comparison

Laptop to replace

Change

MSI GF65 Thin

15.6 inches | January 2021

CHECK PRICE

Change

MSI GF75 Thin

17.3 inches | January 2021

CHECK PRICE

MSI GF65 Thin vs MSI GF75 Thin Comparison Overview

MSI GF65 Thin

See at AMAZON

MSI GF75 Thin

See at AMAZON

MSI GF65 Thin

See at AMAZON

MSI GF75 Thin

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin, two laptops by MSI. MSI GF65 Thin was introduced to market in January 2021 and MSI GF75 Thin was launched in January 2021. Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin are members of MSI's Thin series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

MSI Thin Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
MSI Thin 15	January 2024	15.6"	359 x 254 x 21.7 mm	1.86 kg (4.1 lbs)
MSI Thin A15	January 2024	15.6"	359 x 254 x 21.7 mm	1.86 kg (4.1 lbs)
MSI GF63 Thin	March 2021	15.6"	359 x 254 x 21.7 mm	1.86 kg (4.1 lbs)
MSI GF65 Thin	January 2021	15.6"	359 x 254 x 21.7 mm	1.86 kg (4.1 lbs)
MSI GF75 Thin	January 2021	17.3"	397 x 260 x 22-23.1 mm	2.3 kg (5.07 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of MSI GF65 Thin and MSI GF75 Thin before getting into our more detailed comparison.

MSI GF65 Thin Key Specs

Launched in January 2021
15.6" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 10200H
GPU: GeForce GTX 1660 TI Mobile
8GB Ram
359 x 254 x 21.7 mm (14.13 x 10 x 0.85 inches)
Weight: 1.86 kg (4.1 lbs)

MSI GF75 Thin Key Specs

Launched in January 2021
17.3" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 10300H
GPU: GeForce GTX 1660 TI Mobile 6GB
16GB Ram
397 x 260 x 22-23.1 mm (15.63 x 10.24 x 0.87-0.91 inches)
Weight: 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose MSI GF65 Thin over MSI GF75 Thin

Weight	1.86 kg vs 2.30 kg	0.44 kg lighter
Side Bezel Thickness	6.8 mm vs 7 mm	0.2 mm thinner bezels
Screen PPI	141 ppi vs 127 ppi	More pixels per inch
Max Brightness	275 nits vs 260 nits	Brighter Screen
Number of USB-C Ports	2x USB 3.2 vs 1x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time

Reasons to choose MSI GF75 Thin over MSI GF65 Thin

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~79.9% vs ~73.6%	Larger screen area ratio
Display Size	17.3 inches vs 15.6 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Number of USB-A Ports	3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time

Common Strengths of MSI GF75 Thin and MSI GF65 Thin

Screen Coating	Matte vs Matte	Less reflections on the screen
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the RAM size
RAM Type	PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x) vs PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x)	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6 vs v6	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
Bluetooth Standard	v5.1 vs v5.1	Fast and Reliable Bluetooth Connections
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.0 vs 1x HDMI 2.0	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Ethernet RJ45 Port	Yes vs Yes	Fast connection to Network via ethernet cable
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of MSI GF75 Thin and MSI GF65 Thin

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
HDR Support	No vs No	No HDR Support
Fingerprint Sensor	No vs No	No fingerprint login feature

MSI GF65 Thin vs MSI GF75 Thin: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the MSI GF65 Thin and the MSI GF75 Thin.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.86 kg (4.1 lbs)	2.3 kg (5.07 lbs)
Surface Area	912 cm2 (141.3 inches2)	1032 cm2 (160.1 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~73.6%	~79.9%
Side Bezel Thickness	~6.8 mm	~7 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.12 kg/inch	0.13 kg/inch
	0.264 lbs/inch	0.286 lbs/inch
Colors	Black	Black

Comparison of the MSI GF65 Thin and the MSI GF75 Thin External Dimensions

Weight

GF65 Thin weighs 1.86 kg (4.1 lbs), whereas the GF75 Thin weighs 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

MSI GF65 Thin

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

MSI GF75 Thin

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Thickness Comparison

MSI GF65 Thin

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

MSI GF75 Thin

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the MSI GF65 Thin is 0.12 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the MSI GF75 Thin is 0.13 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch
LG Gram 14 2022: 0.07 kg/inch

MSI GF65 Thin vs MSI GF75 Thin: Internals (CPU, GPU, RAM, Battery, SSD, etc.) Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core i5 10200H Intel Core i5 10300H Intel Core i7 10750H	Intel Core i5 10300H Intel Core i7 10750H
Base Frequency	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.1 GHz	4.5 GHz
Number of Cores	4	4
Number of Threads	8	8
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel UHD Graphics 630	Intel UHD Graphics 630
CPU Fabrication Process	14 nm	14 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the MSI GF65 Thin and MSI GF75 Thin.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core i5 10200H

Laptops with: Intel Core i5 10300H

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	GeForce GTX 1660 TI Mobile GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile	GeForce GTX 1660 TI Mobile 6GB GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile 6GB
Base Clock Frequency	1455 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1590 MHz	1590 MHz
Nvidia Optimus	Yes	Yes
Type	Dedicated	Dedicated
FLOPS	4.884 TFLOPS	4.884 TFLOPS
Memory Size	6 GB	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bus	192 bit	192 bit
Memory Speed	1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective	~12 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	1536	1536
TMUs	96	96
ROPs	48	48

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. MSI GF65 Thin has a FLOPS value of 4.884 TFLOPS whereas the MSI GF75 Thin ' has a FLOPS value of 4.884 TFLOPS.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB 32GB 64GB	16GB 32GB 64GB
Memory Bus	1x8 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	3200 MHz	3200 MHz
RAM Type	DDR4	DDR4
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Max RAM Size	64 GB	64 GB
Total Slots	2	2
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x)

The GF75 Thin provides a larger RAM capacity of 16 GB, which allows for smoother multitasking and improved performance in memory-demanding tasks compared to the GF65 Thin's RAM capacity of 8 GB.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	MSI GF65 Thin	MSI GF75 Thin
Small Models(1-3B):Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B	✔ Run smoothly.	✔ Run smoothly.
Medium Models(7-8B):Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B	✖ Not supported.	✖ Not supported.
Large Models(13-30B):Examples: Mixtral, Qwen-14B	✖ Not supported.	✖ Not supported.
Extra-Large Models(65B+):Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B	✖ Not supported on most systems. Requires high-end GPU or advanced setup.	✖ Not supported on most systems. Requires high-end GPU or advanced setup.

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 MoE Models: Some models like Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen3-30B-A3B use a Mixture of Experts (MoE) design, activating only part of the model during inference. This means they can often run efficiently on laptops with 12–16 GB of VRAM when quantized.

BATTERY

BATTERY	51 Wh	51 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	Yes	Yes
USB Power Delivery	No	No
Charging Port Position	Bottom	Bottom
Charge Power	180 W	180 W

Furthermore, both laptops have the same battery capacity of 51 Wh, ensuring comparable battery performance.

Battery Comparison

MSI GF65 Thin

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

MSI GF75 Thin

Avg: larger than 17.0"

STORAGE
Both laptops, the GF65 Thin and the GF75 Thin have similar max. storage capacities of 1 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	2	2
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

MSI GF65 Thin vs MSI GF75 Thin: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the MSI GF65 Thin and MSI GF75 Thin since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. GF65 Thin has a display size of 15.6".On the other hand, GF75 Thin has a larger17.3" display.The total usable screen area of the GF65 Thin is 670cm² / 104inch² whereas the GF75 Thin's total usable screen area is 825cm² / 128inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the GF65 Thin features a higher pixel density with 141 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

MSI GF65 Thin

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

MSI GF75 Thin

Avg: larger than 17.0"

Refresh Rate
Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin offer the same refresh rate of 144 Hz.

Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin boast the same response time of 3.0 ms.

Brightness
The GF65 Thin offers a higher maximum brightness of 275 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

MSI GF65 Thin

Avg: 15.0-15.9"

MSI GF75 Thin

Avg: larger than 17.0"

MSI GF65 Thin vs MSI GF75 Thin Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Both laptops offer the same Wi-Fi standard (v6), ensuring fast and reliable wireless connections.

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin have USB-A ports. GF65 Thin has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while GF75 Thin has 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin have USB Type-C ports. GF65 Thin has 2x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports, while GF75 Thin has 1x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Neither GF65 Thin nor GF75 Thin has Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin feature an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.0) for connecting to external monitors.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Neither GF65 Thin nor GF75 Thin has an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both GF65 Thin and GF75 Thin are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6	v6
Bluetooth (latest: v5.4)	v5.1	v5.1
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 3.2	1x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	No
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.0	1x HDMI 2.0
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	Yes	Yes
SD CardReader	No	No
Proprietary Charging Port	Yes	Yes