LG Gram 14 2022 vs Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

LG Gram 14 2022

14 inches | April 2022

Speed 4

Size 9.5

Display 4

Gaming 2

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

13.3 inches | July 2019

Speed 2.5

Size 9

Display 5.5

Gaming 1.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

LG Gram 14 2022 vs Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 Comparison Overview

LG Gram 14 2022

See at AMAZON

Apple MacBook Pro 13...

See at AMAZON

LG Gram 14 2022

See at AMAZON

Apple MacBook Pro 13...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Gram 14 2022 and MacBook Pro 13 2019, two laptops from LG and Apple. LG Gram 14 2022 was introduced to market in April 2022 and Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 was launched in July 2019. As you can see, MacBook Pro 13 2019 is 3 years older than Gram 14 2022. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of LG Gram 14 2022 and Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

LG Gram 14 2022 Key Specs

Launched in April 2022
14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 1240P
GPU: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
8GB Ram
312 x 213.9 x 16.8 mm (12.28 x 8.42 x 0.66 inches)
Weight: 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 Key Specs

Launched in July 2019
13.3" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 8257U
GPU: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
8GB Ram
304.1 x 212.4 x 14.9 mm (11.97 x 8.36 x 0.59 inches)
Weight: 1.37 kg (3.02 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Gram 14 2022 and MacBook Pro 13 2019 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose LG Gram 14 2022 over Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

Weight	0.99 kg vs 1.37 kg	0.38 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio	~85.2% vs ~79.4%	Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness	5.3 mm vs 8.8 mm	3.5 mm thinner bezels
Display Size	14 inches vs 13.3 inches	Larger Screen Estate
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm vs 14 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	10 nm vs 14 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	1.41 TFLOPS vs 0.81 TFLOPS	Faster RAM Type
RAM Type	LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3	Easily increase the Storage when needed
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs No	More advanced Wi-fi connectivity
WiFi Standard	v6E vs v5	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth	v5.1 vs v4.2	Higher Resolution Camera
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Faster USB-C connection
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.1	Connect to external monitors directly via HDMI cable
HDMI Port	1x HDMI 2.0 vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No

Reasons to choose Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 over LG Gram 14 2022

Contrast Rate	1524:1 vs 1200:1	more pleasing colors
Screen PPI	227 ppi vs 157 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	2560 x 1600 pixels vs 1920 x 1080 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Max Brightness	500 nits vs 350 nits	Brighter Screen
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Left	Flexible cable positions
Dolby Atmos Speakers	Yes vs No	3D Surround Sound Support
Number of Microphones	3 vs 2	Better Sound capture
Touchpad Size	13.4 x 8.1 cm vs 11.1 x 6.9 cm	Larger Touchpad Area

Common Strengths of Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 and LG Gram 14 2022

Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
USB Power Delivery	Yes vs Yes	Charging via USB port gives flexibility
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Thunderbolt Port	v4 vs v3	Fast data and power transfer via Thunderbolt Port
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 and LG Gram 14 2022

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability
Upgradable RAM	No vs No	No Option to increase the RAM size

LG Gram 14 2022 vs Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the LG Gram 14 2022 and the Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019.

Physical Specs
Weight	0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)	1.37 kg (3.02 lbs)
Surface Area	667 cm2 (103.4 inches2)	646 cm2 (100.1 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~85.2%	~79.4%
Side Bezel Thickness	~5.3 mm	~8.8 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.07 kg/inch	0.10 kg/inch
	0.154 lbs/inch	0.22 lbs/inch
Colors	White, Black	Silver, Gray

Comparison of the LG Gram 14 2022 and the Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 External Dimensions

Weight

Gram 14 2022 weighs 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs), whereas the MacBook Pro 13 2019 weighs 1.37 kg (3.02 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.

Weight Comparison

LG Gram 14 2022

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Thickness Comparison

LG Gram 14 2022

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the LG Gram 14 2022 is 0.07 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 is 0.10 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

LG Gram 14 2022 vs Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core i5 1240P Intel Core i7 1260P	Intel Core i5 8257U Intel Core i5 8279U Intel Core i7 8557U
Base Frequency	1.7 GHz	1.4 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.4 GHz	3.9 GHz
Number of Cores	12	4
Number of Threads	16	8
L3 Cache	12 MB	6 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm	14 nm

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the LG Gram 14 2022 and Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPU ( Intel Core i5 1240P ) and compare them:

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Base Clock Frequency	300 MHz	300 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1100 MHz	1050 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	15 W	15 W
Type	Integrated	Integrated
FLOPS	1.41 TFLOPS	0.81 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Type	LPDDR5	LPDDR3
Memory Bus	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Speed	5.2 Gbps	2.13 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	640	384
TMUs	40	48
ROPs	20	6

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. LG Gram 14 2022 has a FLOPS value of 1.41 TFLOPS whereas the Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 ' has a FLOPS value of 0.81 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the LG Gram 14 2022 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB 32GB	8GB 16GB
Memory Bus	2x4 GB
RAM Clock	5200 MHz	2133 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR5	LPDDR3
Upgradable	No	No

Both laptops, the Gram 14 2022 and the MacBook Pro 13 2019, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	LG Gram 14 (2022)	Apple MacBook Pro 13 (2019)
CPU	Intel Core i5 1240P	Intel Core i5 8257U
GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics (80EU)	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Memory	8 GB	8 GB
Available for LLM total	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	✔ Modest Speed fits in your 3.5 GB RAM	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 3.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

LG Gram 14 (2022)|Apple MacBook Pro 13 (2019)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	72 Wh	58 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	No
USB Power Delivery	Yes	Yes
Charging Port Position	Left	Left, Right
Charge Power	65 W	61 W

Moreover, the Gram 14 2022 boasts a larger battery capacity of 72 Wh, offering extended usage time compared to the MacBook Pro 13 2019's58 Wh.

Battery Comparison

LG Gram 14 2022

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

STORAGE
The MacBook Pro 13 2019 offers a larger max storage capacity of 2 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the Gram 14 2022's storage capacity of 1 TB.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB
Upgradable	Yes	No
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	Custom

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

LG Gram 14 2022 vs Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the LG Gram 14 2022 and Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Gram 14 2022 has a display size of 14.0".On the other hand, MacBook Pro 13 2019 has a smaller 13.3" display.The total usable screen area of the Gram 14 2022 is 568cm² / 88inch² whereas the MacBook Pro 13 2019's total usable screen area is 513cm² / 80inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the MacBook Pro 13 2019 features a higher pixel density with 227 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

LG Gram 14 2022

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

Refresh Rate
Both Gram 14 2022 and MacBook Pro 13 2019 offer the same refresh rate of 60 Hz.

Brightness
The MacBook Pro 13 2019 offers a higher maximum brightness of 500 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

LG Gram 14 2022

Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019

Avg: 13.0-13.9"

LG Gram 14 2022 vs Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Gram 14 2022 features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v6E, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to MacBook Pro 13 2019 (v5).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Gram 14 2022 is equipped with 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports. MacBook Pro 13 2019 does not have USB-A ports.
Both Gram 14 2022 and MacBook Pro 13 2019 have USB Type-C ports. Gram 14 2022 has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while MacBook Pro 13 2019 has 2x USB 3.1 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Both Gram 14 2022 and MacBook Pro 13 2019 feature Thunderbolt ports. Gram 14 2022 has Thunderbolt 4, while MacBook Pro 13 2019 has Thunderbolt 3.

HDMI
Gram 14 2022 features an HDMI port (1x HDMI 2.0) for connecting to external monitors. MacBook Pro 13 2019 does not have an HDMI port.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Gram 14 2022 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. MacBook Pro 13 2019 does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Gram 14 2022 and MacBook Pro 13 2019 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v5
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.1	v4.2
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	No
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	2x USB 3.1
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 3
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.0	No
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	Yes	No
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No