Acer Chromebook 314 vs Razer Blade 14 2023 Comparison

Laptop to replace

Change

Acer Chromebook 314

14 inches | January 2022

CHECK PRICE

Change

Razer Blade 14 2023

14 inches | June 2023

CHECK PRICE

Acer Chromebook 314 vs Razer Blade 14 2023 Comparison Overview

Acer Chromebook 314

See at AMAZON

Razer Blade 14 2023

See at AMAZON

Acer Chromebook 314

See at AMAZON

Razer Blade 14 2023

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023, two laptops from Acer and Razer. Acer Chromebook 314 was introduced to market in January 2022 and Razer Blade 14 2023 was launched in June 2023. There is 17 months difference between Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 so it would still give an advantage to younger Blade 14 2023.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Here is a brief look at the main features of Acer Chromebook 314 and Razer Blade 14 2023 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Acer Chromebook 314 Key Specs

Launched in January 2022
14.0" TouchScreen - TN LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Celeron N4020
GPU: Intel UHD Graphics 600
4GB Ram
325.4 x 232 x 19.7 mm (12.81 x 9.13 x 0.78 inches)
Weight: 1.7 kg (3.75 lbs)

Razer Blade 14 2023 Key Specs

Launched in June 2023
14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
GPU: GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB
16GB Ram
319.7 x 220 x 16.8 mm (12.59 x 8.66 x 0.66 inches)
Weight: 1.78 kg (3.92 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Acer Chromebook 314 over Razer Blade 14 2023

Weight	1.70 kg vs 1.78 kg	0.08 kg lighter
Side Bezel Thickness	7.8 mm vs 9.1 mm	1.3 mm thinner bezels
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Interact with your fingers
SD Card Reader	Yes vs No	Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
Avg. MSRP Price	$0-400 vs $2400-2800	Lower Price (*may change depending on config, seller, location, and time)

Reasons to choose Razer Blade 14 2023 over Acer Chromebook 314

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~80.8% vs ~71.6%	Larger screen area ratio
Refresh Rate	240 Hz vs 60 Hz	Smoother media experience
Screen PPI	216 ppi vs 112 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	2560 x 1600 pixels vs 1366 x 768 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
CPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 14 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	4 nm vs 14 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	16.8 TFLOPS vs 0.14 TFLOPS	Dedicated GPU unit
GPU Type	Dedicated vs Integrated	Flexible cable positions
Charging Port Position	Left, Right vs Left	Faster RAM Type
RAM Type	DDR5 vs LPDDR4X	More RAM Options
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	Easily increase the Storage when needed
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs No	Faster data transfers
NVMe Type SSD	Yes vs No	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth	v5.3 vs v5	Higher Resolution Camera
Webcam Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Faster USB-A
USB-A Port Type	3.2 vs 3.0	Faster USB-C connection
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.1	Better HDMI connectivity
HDMI Version	2.1 vs 1.4	Easily see the keys under low light
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs No

Common Strengths of Razer Blade 14 2023 and Acer Chromebook 314

Launch Dates	January 2022 vs June 2023	Both laptops are recent models
Screen Coating	Matte vs Matte	Less reflections on the screen
Wi-Fi Standard	v6 vs v6E	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 1.4 vs 1x HDMI 1.4	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable

Common Weaknesses of Razer Blade 14 2023 and Acer Chromebook 314

Fingerprint Sensor	No vs No	No fingerprint login feature

Acer Chromebook 314 vs Razer Blade 14 2023: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the Acer Chromebook 314 and the Razer Blade 14 2023.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.7 kg (3.75 lbs)	1.78 kg (3.92 lbs)
Surface Area	755 cm2 (117 inches2)	703 cm2 (109 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~71.6%	~80.8%
Side Bezel Thickness	~7.8 mm	~9.1 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.12 kg/inch	0.13 kg/inch
	0.264 lbs/inch	0.286 lbs/inch
Colors	Silver	Black

Comparison of the Acer Chromebook 314 and the Razer Blade 14 2023 External Dimensions

Weight

Chromebook 314 weighs 1.7 kg (3.75 lbs), whereas the Blade 14 2023 weighs 1.78 kg (3.92 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. The weight difference between the two laptops is not significant.

Weight Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Acer Chromebook 314

Razer Blade 14 2023

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Acer Chromebook 314

Razer Blade 14 2023

Min

Average

Max

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the Acer Chromebook 314 is 0.12 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Razer Blade 14 2023 is 0.13 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch
LG Gram 14 2022: 0.07 kg/inch

Acer Chromebook 314 vs Razer Blade 14 2023: Internals (CPU, GPU, RAM, Battery, SSD, etc.) Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Celeron N4020 Intel Celeron N4500 Intel Celeron N5100 Intel Pentium Silver N6000	AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Base Frequency	1.1 GHz	4.0 GHz
Number of Cores	2	8
Number of Threads	2	16
Integrated GPU	Intel UHD Graphics 600	Radeon 780M
CPU Fabrication Process	14 nm	4 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single)	470	2035
Geekbench 5 (Multi)	864	12583
Cinebench 23 (Single)	457	1838
Cinebench 23 (Multi)	783	17620

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the Acer Chromebook 314 and Razer Blade 14 2023.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Celeron N4020

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 600	GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile 8GB GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 8GB
Base Clock Frequency	200 MHz	1545 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	650 MHz	1890 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	5 W	115 W
Type	Integrated	Dedicated
FLOPS	124.8 GFLOPS	11.61 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	8 GB
Memory Type	System Shared	GDDR6
Memory Bus	System Shared	128 bit
Memory Speed	System Shared	2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Shading Units Cores	96	3072
TMUs	12	96
ROPs	2	48

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. Acer Chromebook 314 has a FLOPS value of 0.14 TFLOPS whereas the Razer Blade 14 2023 ' has a FLOPS value of 16.8 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Razer Blade 14 2023 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	4GB	16GB 32GB
Memory Bus	1x4 GB	2x8 GB
RAM Clock	4266 MHz	5600 MHz
RAM Type	LPDDR4X	DDR5
Upgradable	No	Yes
Memory Bus	Custom	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

The Blade 14 2023 provides a larger RAM capacity of 16 GB, which allows for smoother multitasking and improved performance in memory-demanding tasks compared to the Chromebook 314's RAM capacity of 4 GB.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	Acer Chromebook 314 CPU/NPU: Intel Celeron N4020 (No NPU)RAM: 4 GBGPU: Intel Uhd Graphics 600	Razer Blade 14 (2023) CPU/NPU: Amd Ryzen 9 7940hs (No NPU)RAM: 16 GBGPU: Geforce Rtx 4060 Mobile 8gb
Small Models(1-3B):Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B	✖ Not supported.	✔ Expected performance: "Runs Well" 2B model with Q4 quantization (recommended): Requires ~2.5 GB memory - fits in your 8 GB VRAM (See performance table below for details)
Medium Models(7-8B):Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B	✖ Not supported.	✔ Expected performance: "Runs Well" 7B model with Q4 quantization (recommended): Requires ~5.3 GB memory - fits in your 8 GB VRAM (See performance table below for details)
Large Models(13-30B):Examples: Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B, Dense 30B	✖ Not supported.	✔ 13–15B: Supported (Q4). 20–30B: Not practical — VRAM insufficient without heavy offload.
Extra-Large Models(65B+):Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B	✖ Not practical on most laptops (64GB+ workstation laptops may be exceptions).	✖ Not practical on most laptops (64GB+ workstation laptops may be exceptions).

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

Acer Chromebook 314|Razer Blade 14 (2023)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total memory, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB unified memory. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems. Note: iGPU laptops use shared (unified) memory with lower bandwidth, making them more sensitive to memory pressure and offloading.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

💡 Since this system uses iGPU, it typically falls in the "Modest Speed" range; more comfortable with short-medium context, expect noticeable slowdown with long context.

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on how much total memory is available for the model (unified RAM) and whether it needs to spill into slower storage. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in available unified memory for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	0 Wh	68.1 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Replaceable	No	No
Charging Port Position	Left	Left, Right
Charge Power	45 W	230 W

On the other hand, the Blade 14 2023 features a higher battery capacity of 68 Wh, delivering longer usage time compared to the Chromebook 314's 45 Wh.

Battery Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Acer Chromebook 314

Razer Blade 14 2023

Min

Average

Max

STORAGE
The Blade 14 2023 offers a larger max storage capacity of 1 TB, providing more room for storing files and data compared to the Chromebook 314's storage capacity of 128 GB.

Storage Options	32 GB, 64 GB, 128 GB	512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	No	Yes
Total Slots	128	1
Storage type	eMMC	SSD (M2)
NVMe	No	Yes

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

Acer Chromebook 314 vs Razer Blade 14 2023: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the Acer Chromebook 314 and Razer Blade 14 2023 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Both Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 screens have the same size of 14.0".The total usable screen area of the Chromebook 314 is 540cm² / 84inch² whereas the Blade 14 2023's total usable screen area is 568cm² / 88inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Blade 14 2023 features a higher pixel density with 216 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Displays size 14.0-14.9 inches

Acer Chromebook 314

Razer Blade 14 2023

Min

Average

Max

Refresh Rate
The Blade 14 2023 offers a higher refresh rate of 240 Hz, resulting in smoother motion and improved visual experience.

Acer Chromebook 314 vs Razer Blade 14 2023 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Blade 14 2023 features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v6E, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to Chromebook 314 (v6).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 have USB-A ports. Chromebook 314 has 2x USB 3.0 USB-A ports, while Blade 14 2023 has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 have USB Type-C ports. Chromebook 314 has 2x USB 3.1 USB Type-C ports, while Blade 14 2023 has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Neither Chromebook 314 nor Blade 14 2023 has Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 feature an HDMI port. Chromebook 314 offers 1x HDMI 1.4, while Blade 14 2023 offers 1x HDMI 2.1.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Chromebook 314 is equipped with an SD Card Reader for easy access to memory cards. Blade 14 2023 does not have an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Chromebook 314 and Blade 14 2023 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6	v6E
Bluetooth (latest: v5.4)	v5	v5.3
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.0	2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 3.1	2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	No	No
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 1.4	1x HDMI 2.1
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	No	No
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	Yes	No
Proprietary Charging Port	No	No