ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel vs ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 Comparison

Laptop to replace

 Change

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

16 inches | May 2022

Speed 5

Size 8

Display 5

Gaming 2.5

CHECK AT AMAZON

 Change

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

16 inches | January 2022

Speed 4

Size 8

Display 7.5

Gaming 2

CHECK AT AMAZON

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel vs ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 Comparison Overview

ASUS Vivobook S16X O...

See at AMAZON

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1...

See at AMAZON

ASUS Vivobook S16X O...

See at AMAZON

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1...

See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603, two laptops by ASUS. ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel was introduced to market in May 2022 and ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 was launched in January 2022. There is only 4 months difference between Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 are members of ASUS's Vivobook series of laptops. Below you can find the latest models from this series.

ASUS Vivobook Series History

	Release Date	Screen Size	Dimensions	Weight
Asus Vivobook 14 X1407Q	January 2025	14.0"	315.2 x 223.4 x 17.9-19.9 mm	1.49 kg (3.29 lbs)
Asus Vivobook S 14 Q423	September 2024	14.0"	310.5 x 221.9 x 13.9-15.9 mm	1.3 kg (2.87 lbs)
Asus Vivobook S 15 S5507	May 2024	15.6"	352.6 x 226.9 x 15.9 mm	1.42 kg (3.13 lbs)
Asus Vivobook 16 X1605	January 2024	16.0"	358.7 x 249.5 x 19.9 mm	1.88 kg (4.15 lbs)
Asus Vivobook S 16 OLED S5606 / M5606	January 2024	16.0"	353.6 x 246.9 x 13.9-15.9 mm	1.5 kg (3.31 lbs)
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406 M5406	January 2024	14.0"	310.5 x 221.9 x 13.9-15.9 mm	1.3 kg (2.87 lbs)
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED S5506 M5506	January 2024	15.6"	353.6 x 246.9 x 13.9-15.9 mm	1.5 kg (3.31 lbs)
Asus Vivobook 17 X1704	January 2024	17.3"	399.3 x 254.3 x 19.9 mm	2.1 kg (4.63 lbs)

Here is a brief look at the main features of ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel Key Specs

Launched in May 2022
16.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: Intel Core i5 12500H
GPU: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
8GB Ram
357.6 x 252.4 x 17.9 mm (14.08 x 9.94 x 0.7 inches)
Weight: 1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 Key Specs

Launched in January 2022
16.0" OLED, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
GPU: Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
8GB Ram
358.4 x 247.7 x 19.9 mm (14.11 x 9.75 x 0.78 inches)
Weight: 1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel over ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

Side Bezel Thickness	6.5 mm vs 6.9 mm	0.4 mm thinner bezels
Screen Type	Matte vs Glossy	potentially less reflections on screen
USB Power Delivery	Yes vs No	Charges via USB-C type cable
Bluetooth	v5.2 vs v5	More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Number of USB-C Ports	2x USB 4.0 vs 1x USB 3.2	Connect more device at the same time
USB-C Port Type	v4.0 vs v3.2	Faster USB-C connection
Thunderbolt	v4 vs No	Support audio, data, power and video all through one single port
HDMI Version	2.0 vs 1.4	Better HDMI connectivity

Reasons to choose ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 over ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

Screen-to-Body Ratio	~83.6% vs ~82.2%	Larger screen area ratio
Screen PPI	283 ppi vs 189 ppi	More pixels per inch
Screen Resolution	3840 x 2400 pixels vs 2560 x 1600 pixels	Higher pixel count screen
Max Brightness	550 nits vs 500 nits	Brighter Screen
CPU Fabrication Process	7 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation CPU
GPU Fabrication Process	7 nm vs 10 nm	Newer Generation GPU
GPU FLOPS	2.05 TFLOPS vs 1.41 TFLOPS	More RAM Options
Upgradable RAM	Yes vs No	Connect more device at the same time
Number of USB-A Ports	3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2	Lower Price (*may change depending on config, seller, location, and time)
Avg. MSRP Price	$400-800 vs $800-1200

Common Strengths of ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 and ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

Launch Dates	May 2022 vs January 2022	Both laptops are recent models
HDR Support	Yes, HDR10 vs Yes, Dolby Vision	Watch HDR Clips
Fast Charging Support	Yes vs Yes	Charge the battery in a shorter time
RAM Type	DDR4 vs DDR4	Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage	Yes vs Yes	Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type	NVMe vs NVMe	Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard	v6E vs v6	Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
HDMI Output	1x HDMI 2.0 vs 1x HDMI 2.0	Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output	No vs No	Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Numeric Pad	Yes vs Yes	Fast way to input numbers
Keyboard Backlight	Yes vs Yes	Easily see the keys under low light

Common Weaknesses of ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 and ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

Touchscreen Capability	No vs No	No Touchscreen Capability

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel vs ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and the ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603.

Physical Specs
Weight	1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)	1.8 kg (3.97 lbs)
Surface Area	903 cm2 (140 inches2)	888 cm2 (137.6 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio	~82.2%	~83.6%
Side Bezel Thickness	~6.5 mm	~6.9 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen	0.11 kg/inch	0.11 kg/inch
	0.242 lbs/inch	0.242 lbs/inch
Colors	Black, Silver, Gray	Silver, Gray
Cover Opening Angle	180Â°	180Â°

Comparison of the ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and the ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 External Dimensions

Weight

Weight Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

Min

Average

Max

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel is 0.11 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 is 0.11 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel vs ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603: Internals Comparison

CPU Comparison

CPU Model	Intel Core i5 12500H Intel Core i7 12700H	AMD Ryzen 7 5800H AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Base Frequency	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency	4.5 GHz	4.4 GHz
Number of Cores	12	8
Number of Threads	16	16
L3 Cache	18 MB	16 MB
Integrated GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)	Radeon RX Vega 8
CPU Fabrication Process	10 nm	7 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single)	1634	1461
Geekbench 5 (Multi)	10250	7439
Cinebench 23 (Single)	1702	1426
Cinebench 23 (Multi)	13247	12233

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: Intel Core i5 12500H

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H

GPU Comparison

GPU Model	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)	Radeon RX Vega 8
Base Clock Frequency	300 MHz	0 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency	1100 MHz	2000 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power)	15 W	15 W
Type	Integrated	Integrated
FLOPS	1.41 TFLOPS	2.048 TFLOPS
Memory Size	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Type	DDR4	DDR4
Memory Bus	System Shared	System Shared
Memory Speed	3.2 Gbps	3.2 Gbps
Shading Units Cores	640	512
TMUs	40	32
ROPs	20	8

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel has a FLOPS value of 1.41 TFLOPS whereas the ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 ' has a FLOPS value of . If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison

RAM	8GB 16GB	8GB 16GB
Memory Bus	2x4 GB	1x8 GB
RAM Clock	3200 MHz	3200 MHz
RAM Type	DDR4	DDR4
Upgradable	No	Yes

Both laptops, the Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and the Vivobook 16X M1603, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.

LOCAL LLM Compatibility Evaluation

This quick guide shows what types of large language models (LLMs) each of these laptops could support, based on their respective hardware specifications. It's meant to help you compare their suitability for running AI models locally.

LLM Category	ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED (12th Gen Intel)	ASUS Vivobook 16X (M1603)
CPU	Intel Core i5 12500H	AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
GPU	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)	Radeon RX Vega 8
Memory	8 GB	8 GB
Available for LLM total	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)	~3.5 GB (3.5 GB RAM)
Small Models (1-3B): Examples: Phi-2, Qwen-1.8B Requires ~2 GB memory	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 3.5 GB RAM	⚠ Borderline / Slow fits in your 3.5 GB RAM
Medium Models (7-8B): Examples: Mistral-7B, Qwen-7B Requires ~5 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Large Models
13-15B Models (e.g., Llama 3 14B, Qwen1.5 14B) Requires ~9 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
16-24B Models (e.g., Dense 20B Q4 ~15.5GB) Requires ~14 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
24-30B Models (e.g., Dense 30B Q4) Requires ~18 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
MoE Models (Mixture-of-Experts) (e.g., Mixtral 8x7B - total ~47B, active ~12-13B) Requires ~24 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM
Extra-Large Models (65B+): Examples: LLaMA2-70B, Qwen1.5-72B Requires ~42 GB memory	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM	✖ Not Supported exceeds available RAM

For more detailed LLM evaluation (subcategories, performance ranges, memory breakdown)

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED (12th Gen Intel)|ASUS Vivobook 16X (M1603)

Note: Optimized (e.g., 4-bit) models may run on limited hardware. Performance depends on runtime and setup.

📌 Model Types: Dense 30B Q4 models typically require around 19–22 GB of total VRAM, so they run best on systems with ≥24 GB VRAM. MoE models like Mixtral 8x7B (≈47B total parameters, usually ≈23–26 GB in 4-bit) also need high memory because all experts must be loaded, even though only a few are active per token. They reduce compute cost per token (similar to a ~12–13B dense model), but not memory usage, so they are not practical on 14–16 GB systems.

🚀 Modern NPU (Neural Processing Unit): Modern processors like AMD Ryzen AI and Intel Core Ultra feature NPU and unified memory architecture. NPUs provide modest performance gains (0-30% faster) with better power efficiency compared to iGPU-only execution. Real-world tests show ~3-10 tok/s range on 13B models with 32GB RAM (varies by runtime, quantization, and context), comparable to iGPU but more power-efficient. Note: These figures are examples from various NPU systems; actual performance depends on your specific hardware configuration.

Understanding Performance Categories

The performance descriptions use general categories because actual speed varies greatly based on your specific hardware, model optimization, context length, and runtime software.

Performance Level	Typical Range	User Experience
Runs Smoothly (High-end dGPU)	50+ tok/s	Real-time response. Feels instant, like ChatGPT.
Runs Well (Mid-range dGPU)	20-50 tok/s	Good interactive performance. Slight delay, but usable.
Modest Speed (iGPU/NPU/CPU)	5-20 tok/s	Usable for tasks that don't need instant responses. Noticeable typing delay.
Borderline / Slow (Limited hardware)	2-5 tok/s	Slow-Very slow. Patience required. Better for batch processing.
Not Practical	<2 tok/s	Too slow for regular use. May cause system hangs or instability.

💡 Tip: Your actual results may be higher or lower than these ranges. Test with your specific hardware to know for sure!

⚠️ Note: Performance categorization is based on VRAM capacity and RAM fallback status. GPU type (memory bandwidth, compute power) can also affect actual performance. Currently, we prioritize whether the model fits in VRAM or requires RAM fallback for classification. We may refine this categorization in future updates based on more detailed benchmarks.

BATTERY

BATTERY	70 Wh	70 Wh
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-Ion
Replaceable	No	No
Fast Charging	No	Yes
USB Power Delivery	Yes	No
Charging Port Position	Right	Right
Charge Power	90 W	90 W

Furthermore, both laptops have the same battery capacity of 70 Wh, ensuring comparable battery performance.

Battery Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

Min

Average

Max

STORAGE
Both laptops, the Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and the Vivobook 16X M1603 have similar max. storage capacities of 1 TB, allowing for ample space to store files and applications.

Storage Options	512 GB, 1 TB	256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB
Upgradable	Yes	Yes
Total Slots	1	1
Storage type	SSD (M2)	SSD (M2)
NVMe	Yes	Yes
Memory Bus	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)	PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)

If your budget allows, we recommend opting for the largest possible disk size, considering the potential increase in storage capacity needs in the future. However, please keep in mind the question 'What will the laptop be used for?' when making this decision. Of course, you can later upgrade the hard disk capacity by getting a larger disk. However, if your laptop has only one disk slot, it may not be as straightforward as a RAM upgrade, where you simply add or replace a module, as moving or cloning files to a new disk may be necessary.

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel vs ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603: Display Comparison

The display is an essential aspect to consider when comparing the ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 since its is the component that you interact the most and significantly impact the experience.

Screen Area and Dimensions

Now let's look at the comparison of the actual display areas of both laptops below, keeping the bezels around the screens out of the equation. Both Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 screens have the same size of 16.0".The total usable screen area of the Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel is 742cm² / 115inch² whereas the Vivobook 16X M1603's total usable screen area is 742cm² / 115inch².

PPI (Pixels per Inch)
Additionally, the Vivobook 16X M1603 features a higher pixel density with 283 pixels per inch (PPI), ensuring sharper image details.

Screen PPI (Pixels Per Inch) Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

Min

Average

Max

Refresh Rate
Both Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 offer the same refresh rate of 60 Hz.

Brightness
The Vivobook 16X M1603 offers a higher maximum brightness of 550 nits, delivering a brighter screen.

Brightness Comparison

Displays size 16.0-16.9 inches

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel

ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603

Min

Average

Max

ASUS Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel vs ASUS Vivobook 16X M1603 Connectivity Comparison

In terms of connectivity,

Wifi
Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel features a more advanced Wi-Fi standard v6E, providing faster and more reliable wireless connections compared to Vivobook 16X M1603 (v6).

Below, you'll find a Wi-Fi Versions Table, along with their release dates and speeds, to provide a brief overview of its development.

Wi-Fi Versions and Speeds

Standard	Speed	Release Date	Network	Frequency Bands (GHz)
Wi-Fi 7	up to 40 Gbps (5 GB/s)	2023	802.11be	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6E	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2020	802.11ax	2.4, 5, 6
Wi-Fi 6	up to 9.6 Gbps (1.2 GB/s)	2019	802.11ax	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 5	up to 6.93 Gbps (866.25 MB/s)	2014	802.11ac	2.4, 5
Wi-Fi 4	up to 600 Mbps (75 MB/s)	2009	802.11n	2.4, 5

* Please note that the provided transfer rates are maximum theoretical values, and real-life performance may vary based on environmental factors.

USB
Both Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 have USB-A ports. Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel has 2x USB 3.2 USB-A ports, while Vivobook 16X M1603 has 3x USB 3.2 USB-A ports.
Both Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 have USB Type-C ports. Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel has 2x USB 4.0 USB Type-C ports, while Vivobook 16X M1603 has 1x USB 3.2 USB Type-C ports.

Below, you'll find a table of USB ports, along with their release dates and speeds.
To mitigate the confusion caused by generation names, the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) suggests using marketing names like USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, and so forth, based on their respective transfer rates.

USB Type and Speeds

USB Type	Version	Speed	Date	Other Features/Explanations
USB4	Gen 4 (2.0)	80 Gbps	2022	Also known as USB 80Gbps
USB4	Gen 3×2	40 Gbps	2019	Also known as USB 40Gbps
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2x2	20 Gbps	2019	Double the data transfer rates of Gen 2
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.1
USB 3.2	3.2 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2017	Previously known as USB 3.0
USB 3.1	3.1 Gen 2	10 Gbps	2013	Faster data transfer rates
USB 3.0	3.1 Gen 1	5 Gbps	2010	SuperSpeed USB, improved data transfer rates
USB 2.0	2.0	480 Mbps	2000	High-speed data transfer
USB 1.0	1.0	1.5 Mbps	1996	Original USB standard

Thunderbolt
Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel is equipped with Thunderbolt 4 port. Vivobook 16X M1603 does not have Thunderbolt port.

HDMI
Both Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 feature an HDMI port. Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel offers 1x HDMI 2.0, while Vivobook 16X M1603 offers 1x HDMI 1.4.

Below, you'll find a comparison table detailing different HDMI versions, including their bandwidth, color depth, maximum resolution, and release dates. This information can be helpful in understanding the capabilities of each HDMI version and choosing the most suitable one for your needs.

HDMI Comparison Table

HDMI Version	Maximum Resolution	Bandwidth (Gbps)	Color Depth (bits)	Release Date
HDMI 2.1-2.1b	7680 x 4320 *(8K)* @ 60p 3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 120p	48.0	48	2017
HDMI 2.0-2.0b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 60p	18.0	48	2013
HDMI 1.4-1.4b	3840 x 2160 *(4K)* @ 30p	10.2	48	2009
HDMI 1.3-1.3a	2560 x 1440 @ 60p	10.2	48	2006
HDMI 1.0-1.2a	1920 x 1200 @ 60p	4.95	24	2002

* Please note that the provided resolution values represent the maximum supported resolution, and actual display quality may depend on other factors such as source content and connected devices.

SD Card Reader
Neither Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel nor Vivobook 16X M1603 has an SD Card Reader.

Audio Jack
Both Vivobook S16X OLED 12th Gen Intel and Vivobook 16X M1603 are equipped with a 3.5mm Audio Jack, providing seamless connection to headphones and speakers.

To summarize the connectivity and ports details, please refer to the table below to see them listed.

Connectivity and Ports
WiFi Standard (latest: v7)	v6E	v6
Bluetooth (latest: v6.2)	v5.2	v5
USB-A (latest: 3.2)	2x USB 3.2	3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C (latest: USB4 2.0)	2x USB 4.0	1x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt (latest: 5)	Thunderbolt 4	No
HDMI (latest: 2.1)	1x HDMI 2.0	1x HDMI 1.4
Display Port (latest: v2.0)	No	No
VGA	No	No
Fingerprint Sensor	Optional	Yes
Optical Drive	No	No
Audio Jack 3.5mm	Yes	Yes
Ethernet RJ45	No	No
SD CardReader	No	No
Proprietary Charging Port	No	Yes