LaptopDecision
  • EN EN
  • ES ES
  • DE DE
  • FR FR
  • JA JA
  • LAPTOPS
    • All Laptops
    • Gaming Laptops
    • Convertible 2-in-1 Laptops
    • Ultralight Laptops
    • Thin&Light Laptops
    • Workstation Laptops
    • Touch Screen Laptops
    • Dual Screen Laptops
    • OLED Screen Laptops
    • Wi-Fi 7 Laptops
    • Laptops by Brand
      • Acer Laptops
      • Apple Laptops
      • ASUS Laptops
      • Dell Laptops
      • Gigabyte Laptops
      • Honor Laptops
      • HP Laptops
      • Huawei Laptops
      • Lenovo Laptops
  • MONITORS New!
    • All Monitors
    • Gaming Monitors
    • Portable Monitors
    • 4K Monitors
    • Ultrawide Monitors
    • Curved Monitors
    • Touch Screen Monitors
    • OLED Monitors
    • High Refresh Rate Monitors
    • Monitors by Brand
      • ASUS Monitors
      • Dell Monitors
      • ViewSonic Monitors
      • Samsung Monitors
      • LG Monitors
      • BenQ Monitors
      • MSI Monitors
  • SMART FIND
  • BLOG

ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 Comparison

x
Laptop to replace
 Change

ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506

15.6 inches | January 2021

Speed 4
Size 7.5
Display 3.5
Gaming 2.5
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506
CHECK AT AMAZON
 Change

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023

14 inches | January 2023

Speed 5
Size 8.5
Display 6
Gaming 3
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023
CHECK AT AMAZON
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 Comparison Overview
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 ASUS TUF Gaming A15...
See at AMAZON
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 Asus ROG Zephyrus G1...
See at AMAZON
ASUS TUF Gaming A15...
See at AMAZON
Asus ROG Zephyrus G1...
See at AMAZON

In this review, we will be comparing TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and ROG Zephyrus G14 2023, two laptops from ASUS and Asus. ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 was introduced to market in January 2021 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 was launched in January 2023. As you can see, TUF Gaming A15 FA506 is 2 years older than ROG Zephyrus G14 2023. Let's see if this age difference between two laptops makes a big difference.

Click for Available Configurations of the Laptops

ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506

GPU:
RAM:
DISPLAY:

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023

CPU:
GPU:
RAM:
DISPLAY:

Here is a brief look at the main features of ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 Key Specs

  • Launched in January 2021
  • 15.6" IPS LCD, 16:9 Aspect Ratio Display
  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  • GPU: GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4GB
  • 8GB Ram
  • 359.8 x 256 x 24.5 mm (14.17 x 10.08 x 0.96 inches)
  • Weight: 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 Key Specs

  • Launched in January 2023
  • 14.0" IPS LCD, 16:10 Aspect Ratio Display
  • CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  • GPU: GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 6GB
  • 8GB Ram
  • 312 x 227 x 19.5-20.5 mm (12.28 x 8.94 x 0.77-0.81 inches)
  • Weight: 1.65 kg (3.64 lbs)

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 compares and decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 over Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023
Display Size
15.6 inches vs 14 inches Larger Screen Estate
Noise Level
49 dB vs 52.2 dB Less fan noise
Number of USB-A Ports
3x USB 3.2 vs 2x USB 3.2 Connect more device at the same time
Ethernet RJ45 Port
Yes vs No Connects to the local network via Ethernet RJ45
Numeric Pad
Yes vs No Fast way to input numbers
Reasons to choose Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 over ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506
Weight
1.65 kg vs 2.30 kg 0.65 kg lighter
Screen-to-Body Ratio
~80.2% vs ~72.9% Larger screen area ratio
Side Bezel Thickness
5.3 mm vs 7.2 mm 1.9 mm thinner bezels
Refresh Rate
144 Hz vs 60 Hz Smoother media experience
Screen PPI
162 ppi vs 141 ppi More pixels per inch
Screen Opening Angle
180° vs 120° More flexible screen
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1200 pixels vs 1920 x 1080 pixels Higher pixel count screen
Max Brightness
400 nits vs 300 nits Brighter Screen
CPU Fabrication Process
6 nm vs 7 nm Newer Generation CPU
GPU FLOPS
7.12 TFLOPS vs 6.7 TFLOPS Faster RAM Type
RAM Type
DDR5 vs DDR4 Higher RAM potential
Max Total RAM
48 GB vs 32 GB Faster RAM
RAM BUS
PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) vs PCI-E Gen 3.0 (4x) Better Sound capture
Number of Microphones
3 vs 2 Generates higher sound levels
Speaker Loudness
80 dB vs 73.9 dB More advanced Bluetooth connectivity
Bluetooth
v5.3 vs v5.2 Higher Resolution Camera
Webcam Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720 Faster USB-C connection
USB-C Port Type
v4.0 vs v3.2 Better HDMI connectivity
HDMI Version
2.1 vs 2.0 Read & Write SD Cards with the built-in reader
SD Card Reader
Yes vs No

Common Strengths of Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 and ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506
Screen Coating
Matte vs Matte Less reflections on the screen
Fast Charging Support
Yes vs Yes Charge the battery in a shorter time
USB Power Delivery
Yes vs Yes Charging via USB port gives flexibility
Upgradable RAM
Yes vs Yes Option to increase the RAM size
RAM Type
DDR4 vs DDR5 Fast RAM type
Upgradable Storage
Yes vs Yes Option to increase the Storage size
SSD Type
NVMe vs NVMe Faster Data Transfers
Wi-Fi Standard
v6 vs v6E Fast and Reliable Wi-Fi Connections
HDMI Output
1x HDMI 2.0 vs 1x HDMI 2.0 Connect to External Displays via HDMI cable
VGA Output
No vs No Connect to External Displays via VGA cable
Keyboard Backlight
Yes vs Yes Easily see the keys under low light
Common Weaknesses of Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 and ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506
Touchscreen Capability
No vs No No Touchscreen Capability
Fingerprint Sensor
No vs No No fingerprint login feature
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023: Physical Specs Comparison

In this section, we will be comparing the physical specifications and body features of the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023.

Physical Specs
Weight 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs) 1.65 kg (3.64 lbs)
Surface Area 921 cm2 (142.8 inches2) 708 cm2 (109.8 inches2)
Screen to Surface Ratio ~72.9% ~80.2%
Side Bezel Thickness ~7.2 mm ~5.3 mm
Weight per Inch of Screen 0.15 kg/inch 0.12 kg/inch
0.33 lbs/inch 0.264 lbs/inch
Colors Black, Gray White, Black
Cover Opening Angle 120° 180°
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 Laptop Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison of the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 External Dimensions

Weight

TUF Gaming A15 FA506 weighs 2.3 kg (5.07 lbs), whereas the ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 weighs 1.65 kg (3.64 lbs). There is a notable difference in weight between these two laptops. However, it's important to consider that comparing their weights directly may not provide a complete picture since they also have different display sizes.
Weight Comparison
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506
Avg: 15.0-15.9"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023
Avg: 14.0-14.9"
Thickness Comparison
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506
Avg: 15.0-15.9"
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023
Avg: 14.0-14.9"

Another value that we use for comparing the weights of the laptops is the Weight per Inch of Screen, which is calculated by dividing the total weight of the model with its usable diagonal screen size. This value for the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 is 0.15 kg/inch.In comparison, this value for the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 is 0.12 kg/inch.Here are some of the best performing laptops in this area:

  • Microsoft Surface Go 4: 0.05 kg/inch
  • LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6 2023: 0.06 kg/inch
  • Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: 0.06 kg/inch
  • Asus Zenbook A14 UX3407: 0.06 kg/inch
  • Microsoft Surface Pro 12: 0.06 kg/inch
  • Asus ProArt PZ14 HT7407: 0.06 kg/inch
  • Dell Latitude 7330: 0.07 kg/inch
  • Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 2: 0.07 kg/inch

ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023: Internals Comparison
CPU Comparison
CPU Model



Base Frequency 3.3 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo Frequency 4.2 GHz 4.75 GHz
Number of Cores 6 8
Number of Threads 12 16
L3 Cache 16 MB 16 MB
Integrated GPU Radeon RX Vega 7 Radeon 680M
CPU Fabrication Process 7 nm 6 nm
Geekbench 5 (Single) 1426 1579
Geekbench 5 (Multi) 6579 9851
Cinebench 23 (Single) 1371 1562
Cinebench 23 (Multi) 9758 14116

Above you can see the CPU options and the CineBench and GeekBench test scores for both laptops, which gives an idea about what kind of performance difference you may experience between the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023.

You may also read reviews of latest laptops with the same CPUs and compare them:

Laptops with: AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
  • MSI Bravo 15 2021 Ryzen Compare
  • MSI Alpha 15 Advantage Edition Compare
  • Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro Gen 6 16-inch AMD Compare
  • Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14-inch AMD Compare
Laptops with: AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  • Lenovo LOQ 15ARP10E Compare
  • Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 14 , Gen 10 Compare
  • Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 15″ Gen 10 Compare
  • MSI Thin A15 Compare
GPU Comparison
GPU Model










Base Clock Frequency 1403 MHz 1530 MHz
Boost CLock Frequency 1635 MHz 1740 MHz
TGP (Total Graphics Power) 75 W 95 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX MUX
Type Dedicated Dedicated
FLOPS 6.7 TFLOPS 7.12 TFLOPS
Memory Size 4 GB 6 GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Bus 128 bit 128 bit
Memory Speed 12 Gbps 12 Gbps
Shading Units Cores 2048 2048
TMUs 64 64
ROPs 32 40

GPU is as critical as the CPU for graphic heavy applications and the table above gives a picture of how the two GPU compares. FLOPS is a measure of a GPU's performance based on the number of floating-point arithmetic calculations that the processor can perform within a second. ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506 has a FLOPS value of 6.7 TFLOPS whereas the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 ' has a FLOPS value of 7.12 TFLOPS. If graphical performance of the laptop is important for your use type, the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2023 may be the better choice between these two setups.

RAM Comparison
RAM







Memory Bus 1x8 GB 1x8 GB
RAM Clock 3200 MHz 4800 MHz
RAM Type DDR4 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Max RAM Size 32 GB 48 GB
Total Slots 2 1
Both laptops, the TUF Gaming A15 FA506 and the ROG Zephyrus G14 2023, come with similar RAM capacities of 8 GB, providing comparable performance in memory-intensive tasks.